An Economic Perspective on Planetary Boundaries

In the current era of ecological scarcity and rising global environmental risks, there are increasing calls for limits on damage to the environment. Some scientists advocate imposing planetary boundaries to protect key Earth system processes from human impacts. This article reviews the economic implications of such an approach. From an economic perspective, planetary boundaries represent both a relative and absolute scarcity problem. Imposing such absolute limits may avoid undesirable tipping points, but they are not sufficient for optimal environmental management. The failure to tackle increasing relative ecological scarcity will lead to unsustainable use and could make keeping within limits unattainable. In view of these challenges raised by the planetary boundary approach, economics has three important roles: more robust modeling of the environmental impacts to incorporate risk and uncertainty, valuing ecological capital and its services, and informing local and global policies for improved management of globally important resources and sinks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Resource Economics
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-013024-033016
Primary Topic
Economic Growth and Productivity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Economic Perspective on Planetary Boundaries

Edward B. Barbier
Annual Review of Resource Economics
Economic Growth and Productivity
article

An Economic Perspective on Planetary Boundaries

Edward B. Barbier
article en

Abstract

In the current era of ecological scarcity and rising global environmental risks, there are increasing calls for limits on damage to the environment. Some scientists advocate imposing planetary boundaries to protect key Earth system processes from human impacts. This article reviews the economic implications of such an approach. From an economic perspective, planetary boundaries represent both a relative and absolute scarcity problem. Imposing such absolute limits may avoid undesirable tipping points, but they are not sufficient for optimal environmental management. The failure to tackle increasing relative ecological scarcity will lead to unsustainable use and could make keeping within limits unattainable. In view of these challenges raised by the planetary boundary approach, economics has three important roles: more robust modeling of the environmental impacts to incorporate risk and uncertainty, valuing ecological capital and its services, and informing local and global policies for improved management of globally important resources and sinks.

Annual Review of Resource EconomicsVol. 17(1)
Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Economic Growth and Productivity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Economic Perspective on Planetary Boundaries — Edward B. Barbier · Annual Review of Resource Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS