Diagnostic Expertise in the Emergency Department

The healthcare community has, in recent years, paid increased attention to errors in the diagnostic process, especially in emergency departments (EDs). However, the expertise of frontline professionals could be an important factor in mitigating risks, preventing diagnostic errors, and improving performance. The current research focused on identifying expertise in ED personnel, complementing efforts to examine errors in reasoning or diagnosis. Data were collected from a three-year, multi-site examination of various EDs. Through the analysis of 43 Critical Decision Method interviews (Klein, Calderwood, & MacGregor, 1989), we identified six aspects of ED expertise: technical, perceptual, organizational, teamwork, emotional, and sensemaking. We also identified barriers to the development of expertise in the ED, such as limited follow-up and feedback on cases. Our findings were consistent with other naturalistic examinations of expertise. Finally, we discuss implications for ED practice, diagnostic safety, and training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15553434251335732
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Expertise in the Emergency Department

Emily Newsome, Eric M. Eisenberg, Shawna J. Perry, Ayşe P. Gürses et al.
Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
article

Diagnostic Expertise in the Emergency Department

Emily Newsome, Eric M. Eisenberg, Shawna J. Perry, Ayşe P. Gürses, Susan K. Peterson, Patience Osei, Gary A. Klein, Kari Hoy
article en

Abstract

The healthcare community has, in recent years, paid increased attention to errors in the diagnostic process, especially in emergency departments (EDs). However, the expertise of frontline professionals could be an important factor in mitigating risks, preventing diagnostic errors, and improving performance. The current research focused on identifying expertise in ED personnel, complementing efforts to examine errors in reasoning or diagnosis. Data were collected from a three-year, multi-site examination of various EDs. Through the analysis of 43 Critical Decision Method interviews (Klein, Calderwood, & MacGregor, 1989), we identified six aspects of ED expertise: technical, perceptual, organizational, teamwork, emotional, and sensemaking. We also identified barriers to the development of expertise in the ED, such as limited follow-up and feedback on cases. Our findings were consistent with other naturalistic examinations of expertise. Finally, we discuss implications for ED practice, diagnostic safety, and training.

Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
Johns Hopkins University (US), University of South Florida (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), University of Florida Health Science Center (US), National Patient Safety Foundation (US)
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Diagnostic Expertise in the Emergency Department — Emily Newsome, Eric M. Eisenberg, et al. · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS