Diagnostic Expertise in the Emergency Department
The healthcare community has, in recent years, paid increased attention to errors in the diagnostic process, especially in emergency departments (EDs). However, the expertise of frontline professionals could be an important factor in mitigating risks, preventing diagnostic errors, and improving performance. The current research focused on identifying expertise in ED personnel, complementing efforts to examine errors in reasoning or diagnosis. Data were collected from a three-year, multi-site examination of various EDs. Through the analysis of 43 Critical Decision Method interviews (Klein, Calderwood, & MacGregor, 1989), we identified six aspects of ED expertise: technical, perceptual, organizational, teamwork, emotional, and sensemaking. We also identified barriers to the development of expertise in the ED, such as limited follow-up and feedback on cases. Our findings were consistent with other naturalistic examinations of expertise. Finally, we discuss implications for ED practice, diagnostic safety, and training.
Authors
- Emily Newsome (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3585-3225)
- Eric M. Eisenberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4839-7249)
- Shawna J. Perry
- Ayşe P. Gürses (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7422-6852)
- Susan K. Peterson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4793-1913)
- Patience Osei (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8734-7434)
- Gary A. Klein (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8430-3230)
- Kari Hoy
Institutions
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of South Florida (US)
- Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
- University of Florida Health Science Center (US)
- National Patient Safety Foundation (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
- Published
- 2025-04-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/15553434251335732
- Primary Topic
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality