Echoes of an origin: Kojève’s philosophy of the inexistent

Abstract Recent scholarship has increasingly acknowledged that the thought and work of Kojève cannot be easily reduced to his reading of Hegel. While important for understanding his idiosyncratic commentary on the Phenomenology of Spirit , it has been argued that his lesser known “early period” texts speak to a train of thought that lies outside the scope of the more familiar themes associated with his philosophy and thus challenge its standard reception. In this essay, I shed further light on the evolution of this thinking by exploring a series of notebooks written in the early 1920s, collectively referred to as the Philosopher’s Journal [ dnevnik filosofa ], which contain the details of what he called “the fundamental principles of a philosophy of the inexistent.” Notwithstanding the lack of attention placed on these notebooks, I argue that they represent a significant contribution to his corpus, revealing the origins of a specific terminology and method, which allows us to view them as a compelling point of departure. Although the so-called principles of a philosophy of the inexistent are sketched out in a cursory manner, their rudimentary form already displays certain tendencies that will linger in his later readings of Kant, Hegel, and Heidegger. Thus, by tracing out the contours of this nascent phase of his thought, we gain entry to a different point of access to his philosophy—a philosophy which, in fact, raises distinct questions regarding “philosophical rigour” itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Continental Philosophy Review
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-025-09685-3
Primary Topic
Historical and Literary Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Echoes of an origin: Kojève’s philosophy of the inexistent

Kyle Moore
Continental Philosophy Review
Historical and Literary Studies
article

Echoes of an origin: Kojève’s philosophy of the inexistent

Kyle Moore
article en

Abstract

Abstract Recent scholarship has increasingly acknowledged that the thought and work of Kojève cannot be easily reduced to his reading of Hegel. While important for understanding his idiosyncratic commentary on the Phenomenology of Spirit , it has been argued that his lesser known “early period” texts speak to a train of thought that lies outside the scope of the more familiar themes associated with his philosophy and thus challenge its standard reception. In this essay, I shed further light on the evolution of this thinking by exploring a series of notebooks written in the early 1920s, collectively referred to as the Philosopher’s Journal [ dnevnik filosofa ], which contain the details of what he called “the fundamental principles of a philosophy of the inexistent.” Notwithstanding the lack of attention placed on these notebooks, I argue that they represent a significant contribution to his corpus, revealing the origins of a specific terminology and method, which allows us to view them as a compelling point of departure. Although the so-called principles of a philosophy of the inexistent are sketched out in a cursory manner, their rudimentary form already displays certain tendencies that will linger in his later readings of Kant, Hegel, and Heidegger. Thus, by tracing out the contours of this nascent phase of his thought, we gain entry to a different point of access to his philosophy—a philosophy which, in fact, raises distinct questions regarding “philosophical rigour” itself.

Continental Philosophy ReviewVol. 58(4)
Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Historical and Literary Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.