Development of systemic infrastructure governance mechanisms to reduce climate-health risks in cities

Abstract Climate-related hazards can lead to multiple infrastructure risks that pose a threat to public health such as extreme heat conditions in housing and transport networks, the flooding of critical utilities and social infrastructure, and air pollution in buildings with vulnerable occupants. Business-as-usual approaches to manage physical infrastructure systems that result in the delivery of standalone interventions by individual city departments in isolated infrastructure systems are not sufficient to manage these systemic risks. The aim of this study is to explore how cities can develop systemic infrastructure governance mechanisms. Specifically, how stakeholders can draw together diverse information sources (including health data) and partnership funding mechanisms focused on the delivery of multiple benefits (including health benefits) to develop integrated infrastructure interventions to reduce climate-health risks. This study examines the infrastructure governance mechanisms developed in three cities: Ottawa (Canada), Belfast (Northern Ireland), and London (England) to draw insight into how cities can establish such systemic infrastructure governance mechanisms. The findings reveal how the development of multi-stakeholder partnerships, diverse information sources, and the use of holistic appraisal mechanisms to evaluate the wider benefits of infrastructure interventions have facilitated the implementation of integrated infrastructure measures to reduce climate-health risks in the case study cities. The research findings also show that these cities have implemented several types of integrated infrastructure measures to reduce climate-health risks such as deep housing retrofit projects and integrated grey-green-blue infrastructure measures to reduce flood risk and promote active travel.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Communications
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/adcf6f
Primary Topic
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of systemic infrastructure governance mechanisms to reduce climate-health risks in cities

Kristen MacAskill, P. John Clarkson, Maria Ikonomova
Environmental Research Communications
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
article

Development of systemic infrastructure governance mechanisms to reduce climate-health risks in cities

Kristen MacAskill, P. John Clarkson, Maria Ikonomova
article en

Abstract

Abstract Climate-related hazards can lead to multiple infrastructure risks that pose a threat to public health such as extreme heat conditions in housing and transport networks, the flooding of critical utilities and social infrastructure, and air pollution in buildings with vulnerable occupants. Business-as-usual approaches to manage physical infrastructure systems that result in the delivery of standalone interventions by individual city departments in isolated infrastructure systems are not sufficient to manage these systemic risks. The aim of this study is to explore how cities can develop systemic infrastructure governance mechanisms. Specifically, how stakeholders can draw together diverse information sources (including health data) and partnership funding mechanisms focused on the delivery of multiple benefits (including health benefits) to develop integrated infrastructure interventions to reduce climate-health risks. This study examines the infrastructure governance mechanisms developed in three cities: Ottawa (Canada), Belfast (Northern Ireland), and London (England) to draw insight into how cities can establish such systemic infrastructure governance mechanisms. The findings reveal how the development of multi-stakeholder partnerships, diverse information sources, and the use of holistic appraisal mechanisms to evaluate the wider benefits of infrastructure interventions have facilitated the implementation of integrated infrastructure measures to reduce climate-health risks in the case study cities. The research findings also show that these cities have implemented several types of integrated infrastructure measures to reduce climate-health risks such as deep housing retrofit projects and integrated grey-green-blue infrastructure measures to reduce flood risk and promote active travel.

Environmental Research CommunicationsVol. 7(5)
University of Cambridge (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.