Isopropanol dehydration by batch extractive distillation under variable pressure

• A batch extractive distillation process is simulated and optimised. • Different pressure policies, including progressively reduced pressure are compared. • Dehydration of isopropanol with DMSO is optimised. • The profit of one batch is maximized under constraints with the Box-complex method. • The CO 2 emissions of the different policies are also compared. The recovery of isopropanol (IPA) in high purity in an industrial column from nearly azeotropic IPA(A)-water(B) mixture by batch extractive distillation is studied by dynamic simulation and optimization. The solvent DMSO (S) is much heavier than A and B. When the temperature of the heating steam is limited, the high boiling point of S (T BP,S ) may require the application of a lower pressure (e.g. vacuum) than that of A/B separation. Three different pressure policies are studied and compared: operation at atmospheric pressure, in vacuum and at progressively reduced pressure. The profit of one batch is maximized with the Box-complex method. The optimization parameters are the feed plate of S, purity and flow rate of S, reflux ratios and stopping criteria of several steps. The volume of the liquid in the reboiler and the purity of the IPA and that of wastewater sent to biological purification mean constraints for the optimization. The CO 2 emissions of the different policies are also compared. The profit obtained in vacuum was higher by 1.03 % than at progressively reduced pressure and by 6 % than at atmospheric pressure. However, the CO 2 emission was the lowest when the pressure was progressively reduced.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Separation and Purification Technology
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2025.133178
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Process Optimization and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Isopropanol dehydration by batch extractive distillation under variable pressure

László Hégely, Bence Németh, Péter Láng
4 citations
Separation and Purification Technology
Process Optimization and Integration
4.86
article

Isopropanol dehydration by batch extractive distillation under variable pressure

László Hégely, Bence Németh, Péter Láng
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• A batch extractive distillation process is simulated and optimised. • Different pressure policies, including progressively reduced pressure are compared. • Dehydration of isopropanol with DMSO is optimised. • The profit of one batch is maximized under constraints with the Box-complex method. • The CO 2 emissions of the different policies are also compared. The recovery of isopropanol (IPA) in high purity in an industrial column from nearly azeotropic IPA(A)-water(B) mixture by batch extractive distillation is studied by dynamic simulation and optimization. The solvent DMSO (S) is much heavier than A and B. When the temperature of the heating steam is limited, the high boiling point of S (T BP,S ) may require the application of a lower pressure (e.g. vacuum) than that of A/B separation. Three different pressure policies are studied and compared: operation at atmospheric pressure, in vacuum and at progressively reduced pressure. The profit of one batch is maximized with the Box-complex method. The optimization parameters are the feed plate of S, purity and flow rate of S, reflux ratios and stopping criteria of several steps. The volume of the liquid in the reboiler and the purity of the IPA and that of wastewater sent to biological purification mean constraints for the optimization. The CO 2 emissions of the different policies are also compared. The profit obtained in vacuum was higher by 1.03 % than at progressively reduced pressure and by 6 % than at atmospheric pressure. However, the CO 2 emission was the lowest when the pressure was progressively reduced.

Separation and Purification TechnologyVol. 369
Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Process Optimization and Integration
4.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.