The effect of irrigation practices on stress-related physiological characteristics, water productivity, and water footprint in rice cultivation

Water plays a critical role in rice cultivation, a major export commodity in Thailand, especially under climate-induced drought conditions. This study evaluated the impact of three irrigation practices—continuous flooding (CF), alternate wetting and drying (AWD), and saturated soil irrigation (SSI)—on physiological parameters and water usage in paddy fields. The results showed no significant differences in physiological traits such as stomatal conductance (g sw ), leaf temperature (T leaf ), chlorophyll fluorescence (F s ), quantum yield (Φ PsII ), osmolality, and MDA content. However, water consumption differed notably: in the first crop season, CF, SSI, and AWD used 9,931, 7,106, and 7338 m 3 /ha, respectively, while in the second season, usage was 9,427, 5,746, and 5794 m 3 /ha. Grain yield remained similar across treatments: 4.13, 4.03, and 4.08 tons/ha in the first crop season, and 4.21, 4.23, and 4.66 tons/ha in the second crop season for CF, SSI, and AWD, respectively. Water productivity (WP IR ) for CF, SSI, and AWD was 0.42, 0.57, and 0.56 kg m −3 in the first crop season and 0.45, 0.74, and 0.80 kg m −3 in the second crop season. The consumptive water footprint (WF consumption ) also varied, with values of 2,607, 1,976, and 2007 m 3 /ton in the first crop season and 2,431, 1,549, and 1401 m 3 /ton in the second crop season, with the highest in the direct blue water footprint category. AWD and SSI significantly increased water productivity. The study underscores the potential of physiological data as a tool to inform sustainable on-farm irrigation strategies. The integration of such practices could contribute to climate-resilient and resource-efficient rice production systems. • The first consideration of plant stress under alternative irrigation in Thailand. • Plant stress showed no significant differences with alternative irrigation. • Using plant physiology is vital for precise agriculture and cutting water use more. • Alternative methods improved water productivity and reduced water footprint.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100695
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of irrigation practices on stress-related physiological characteristics, water productivity, and water footprint in rice cultivation

Songsak Puttrawutichai, Bittawat Wichaidist, Amornrat Intrman, Chaisri Suksaroj et al.
2 citations
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
3.50
article

The effect of irrigation practices on stress-related physiological characteristics, water productivity, and water footprint in rice cultivation

Songsak Puttrawutichai, Bittawat Wichaidist, Amornrat Intrman, Chaisri Suksaroj, Chawakorn Rewtragulpaibul, Pawit Junhom
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Water plays a critical role in rice cultivation, a major export commodity in Thailand, especially under climate-induced drought conditions. This study evaluated the impact of three irrigation practices—continuous flooding (CF), alternate wetting and drying (AWD), and saturated soil irrigation (SSI)—on physiological parameters and water usage in paddy fields. The results showed no significant differences in physiological traits such as stomatal conductance (g sw ), leaf temperature (T leaf ), chlorophyll fluorescence (F s ), quantum yield (Φ PsII ), osmolality, and MDA content. However, water consumption differed notably: in the first crop season, CF, SSI, and AWD used 9,931, 7,106, and 7338 m 3 /ha, respectively, while in the second season, usage was 9,427, 5,746, and 5794 m 3 /ha. Grain yield remained similar across treatments: 4.13, 4.03, and 4.08 tons/ha in the first crop season, and 4.21, 4.23, and 4.66 tons/ha in the second crop season for CF, SSI, and AWD, respectively. Water productivity (WP IR ) for CF, SSI, and AWD was 0.42, 0.57, and 0.56 kg m −3 in the first crop season and 0.45, 0.74, and 0.80 kg m −3 in the second crop season. The consumptive water footprint (WF consumption ) also varied, with values of 2,607, 1,976, and 2007 m 3 /ton in the first crop season and 2,431, 1,549, and 1401 m 3 /ton in the second crop season, with the highest in the direct blue water footprint category. AWD and SSI significantly increased water productivity. The study underscores the potential of physiological data as a tool to inform sustainable on-farm irrigation strategies. The integration of such practices could contribute to climate-resilient and resource-efficient rice production systems. • The first consideration of plant stress under alternative irrigation in Thailand. • Plant stress showed no significant differences with alternative irrigation. • Using plant physiology is vital for precise agriculture and cutting water use more. • Alternative methods improved water productivity and reduced water footprint.

Environmental and Sustainability IndicatorsVol. 26
National Research Council of Thailand
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
3.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.