Cyber risk assessment for capital management

Abstract This paper introduces a two‐pillar cyber risk management framework to address the pervasive challenges in managing cyber risk. The first pillar, cyber risk assessment, combines insurance frequency‐severity models with cybersecurity cascade models to capture the unique nature of cyber risk. The second pillar, cyber capital management, facilitates informed allocation of capital for a balanced cyber risk management strategy, including cybersecurity investments, insurance coverage, and reserves. A case study, based on historical cyber incident data and realistic assumptions, demonstrates the necessity of comprehensive cost–benefit analysis for budget‐constrained companies with competing objectives in cyber risk management. In addition, sensitivity analysis highlights the dependence of the optimal strategy on factors such as the price of cybersecurity controls and their effectiveness. The framework's implementation across a diverse range of companies yields general insights on cyber risk management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Risk & Insurance
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12504
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cyber risk assessment for capital management

Hins Hu, Runhuan Feng, Wing Fung Chong, Linfeng Zhang
5 citations
Journal of Risk & Insurance
Information and Cyber Security
16.23
article

Cyber risk assessment for capital management

Hins Hu, Runhuan Feng, Wing Fung Chong, Linfeng Zhang
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper introduces a two‐pillar cyber risk management framework to address the pervasive challenges in managing cyber risk. The first pillar, cyber risk assessment, combines insurance frequency‐severity models with cybersecurity cascade models to capture the unique nature of cyber risk. The second pillar, cyber capital management, facilitates informed allocation of capital for a balanced cyber risk management strategy, including cybersecurity investments, insurance coverage, and reserves. A case study, based on historical cyber incident data and realistic assumptions, demonstrates the necessity of comprehensive cost–benefit analysis for budget‐constrained companies with competing objectives in cyber risk management. In addition, sensitivity analysis highlights the dependence of the optimal strategy on factors such as the price of cybersecurity controls and their effectiveness. The framework's implementation across a diverse range of companies yields general insights on cyber risk management.

Journal of Risk & InsuranceVol. 92(2)
Cornell University (US), Heriot-Watt University (GB), Maxwell Institute for Mathematical Sciences (GB), The Ohio State University (US), Tsinghua University (CN)
Society of Actuaries
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Information and Cyber Security
16.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.