Mental health during and after the COVID-19 pandemic – a longitudinal study over 42 months in five European countries

<b>Background:</b> The mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is well documented. However, only a few studies investigated mental health in later phases of the pandemic and after its official end. Moreover, little is known about people's psychological burden related to the pandemic and other global crises post-pandemic.<b>Objective:</b> Study's first objective was to compare mental health outcomes in the general population over the course of the pandemic and ten months post-pandemic. The second objective was to explore people's psychological burden regarding the pandemic, in comparison to current wars, climate crises, inflation, and poor government management and/or corruption in the post-pandemic era.<b>Method:</b> Participants from the general population of Austria, Croatia, Germany, Greece, and Portugal (68.8% female, <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 41.55) were assessed online up to four times between June 2020 and March 2024 (baseline sample: <i>N</i> = 7913). <i>Adjustment Disorder New Module - 8</i> (ADNM-8), <i>Patient Health Questionnaire</i> (PHQ-2), and <i>World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index</i> (WHO-5) were used to measure adjustment disorder, depression, and well-being. Prevalence rates were calculated and repeated measures ANOVAs applied to assess mental health at four time points. One-way repeated measures ANOVA was run to explore how the different global crises were related to participants' burden.<b>Results:</b> Temporal variations in mental health were evident across four assessment waves, with highest levels of probable adjustment disorder and depression in winter 2020/2021 (T2). A slight improvement of mental health was found at later time points. Current wars and inflation were the greatest sources of psychological burden at the post-pandemic assessment, revealing some cross-country differences.<b>Conclusion:</b> Although mental health differences in the general population were not as pronounced as in the acute phase of the pandemic, psychosocial support is still needed post-pandemic. This is likely to be due to other global crises that take a toll on people's mental health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488700
Citations
19
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
43.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mental health during and after the COVID-19 pandemic – a longitudinal study over 42 months in five European countries

Camila Borges, Laura Kenntemich, Brigitte Lueger‐Schuster, Xenia Anastassiou‐Hadjicharalambous et al.
19 citations
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
COVID-19 and Mental Health
43.83
article

Mental health during and after the COVID-19 pandemic – a longitudinal study over 42 months in five European countries

Camila Borges, Laura Kenntemich, Brigitte Lueger‐Schuster, Xenia Anastassiou‐Hadjicharalambous, Annett Lotzin, Irina Zrnić Novaković, Ingo Schäfer, Eleftheria Evgeniou, Margarida Figueiredo‐Braga, Marina Ajduković, Margherita Russo, Dean Ajduković
article en
19 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> The mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is well documented. However, only a few studies investigated mental health in later phases of the pandemic and after its official end. Moreover, little is known about people's psychological burden related to the pandemic and other global crises post-pandemic.<b>Objective:</b> Study's first objective was to compare mental health outcomes in the general population over the course of the pandemic and ten months post-pandemic. The second objective was to explore people's psychological burden regarding the pandemic, in comparison to current wars, climate crises, inflation, and poor government management and/or corruption in the post-pandemic era.<b>Method:</b> Participants from the general population of Austria, Croatia, Germany, Greece, and Portugal (68.8% female, <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 41.55) were assessed online up to four times between June 2020 and March 2024 (baseline sample: <i>N</i> = 7913). <i>Adjustment Disorder New Module - 8</i> (ADNM-8), <i>Patient Health Questionnaire</i> (PHQ-2), and <i>World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index</i> (WHO-5) were used to measure adjustment disorder, depression, and well-being. Prevalence rates were calculated and repeated measures ANOVAs applied to assess mental health at four time points. One-way repeated measures ANOVA was run to explore how the different global crises were related to participants' burden.<b>Results:</b> Temporal variations in mental health were evident across four assessment waves, with highest levels of probable adjustment disorder and depression in winter 2020/2021 (T2). A slight improvement of mental health was found at later time points. Current wars and inflation were the greatest sources of psychological burden at the post-pandemic assessment, revealing some cross-country differences.<b>Conclusion:</b> Although mental health differences in the general population were not as pronounced as in the acute phase of the pandemic, psychosocial support is still needed post-pandemic. This is likely to be due to other global crises that take a toll on people's mental health.

European Journal of PsychotraumatologyVol. 16(1)
University of Vienna (AT), Universität Hamburg (DE), University of Nicosia (CY), University of Zagreb (HR), Universidade do Porto (PT), MSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), University of Coimbra (PT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
43.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.