Debate: What guidance is needed by academics who collaborate with digital companies to improve youth mental health?

In a recent debate piece, Livingstone, Orben and Odgers (Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 2023, 28, 150) asked whether and when it is advisable for academics researching youth mental health to collaborate with digital companies. Such collaborations arise when researchers seek to identify risks and opportunities associated with youth digital engagement or to develop research-based interventions that leverage digital technologies to improve young people's mental health. However, young people's digital experiences, the associated data records and the prospects of testing interventions in situ are often under the control of digital providers and inaccessible to researchers. There is growing optimism that collaboration with companies may allow independent researchers access to proprietary resources along with opportunities to test and scale up beneficial digital interventions. Understandably, such optimism is tempered by scepticism about the processes, trust, and interests at stake during collaboration between researchers and companies. Given these often opposed positions, it is clear that professional guidance is required for academics so they understand the potential costs and benefits of choosing to enter into such collaborations and the terms on which this is advisable. This article highlights what information already exists for researchers and what guidance is needed to ensure that youth mental health researchers can successfully collaborate with digital companies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12779
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Debate: What guidance is needed by academics who collaborate with digital companies to improve youth mental health?

Joanne Gregory, Adam S. R. Parker, Sonia Livingstone, Chris Hollis et al.
3 citations
Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Digital Mental Health Interventions
4.63
article

Debate: What guidance is needed by academics who collaborate with digital companies to improve youth mental health?

Joanne Gregory, Adam S. R. Parker, Sonia Livingstone, Chris Hollis, Jacob A Andrews, Emma Nielsen, Ellen Townsend, Camilla Babbage, Sieun Lee, Marianne E. Etherson, Adrian J. Williams, Rebecca Woodcock, Jake Bourgaize, Josimar Antônio de Alcântara Mendes, Kareem Khan, Joanna Lockwood, Jen Martin
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In a recent debate piece, Livingstone, Orben and Odgers (Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 2023, 28, 150) asked whether and when it is advisable for academics researching youth mental health to collaborate with digital companies. Such collaborations arise when researchers seek to identify risks and opportunities associated with youth digital engagement or to develop research-based interventions that leverage digital technologies to improve young people's mental health. However, young people's digital experiences, the associated data records and the prospects of testing interventions in situ are often under the control of digital providers and inaccessible to researchers. There is growing optimism that collaboration with companies may allow independent researchers access to proprietary resources along with opportunities to test and scale up beneficial digital interventions. Understandably, such optimism is tempered by scepticism about the processes, trust, and interests at stake during collaboration between researchers and companies. Given these often opposed positions, it is clear that professional guidance is required for academics so they understand the potential costs and benefits of choosing to enter into such collaborations and the terms on which this is advisable. This article highlights what information already exists for researchers and what guidance is needed to ensure that youth mental health researchers can successfully collaborate with digital companies.

Child and Adolescent Mental HealthVol. 30(3)
University of Nottingham (GB), King's College London (GB), Centre for Mental Health (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (GB), De Montfort University (GB), University of Glasgow (GB), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Medical Research Centre, Arts and Humanities Research Council, Medical Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
4.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.