Exploring Learning Engineering Design Decision Tracking: Emergent Themes from Practitioners’ Work

Abstract This paper examines design decisions that were written down and enacted by learning design practitioners across 18 projects at a postsecondary institution. Through emergent coding of decisions recorded in a Learning Engineering Evidence and Decision (LEED) tracker in situ, this research answers 3 questions: (1) how do practitioners track and cite sources of influence on design decisions, (2) how do practitioners communicate, revisit, and iterate these decisions throughout cycles of their design, and (3) when revisions were made to decisions, what sources of influence led to these changes? Findings indicate that practitioners record new and revised decisions while also tracking influences on these decisions that stem from their own experiences and from the specific project context. This work contributes to the support of learning design practitioners by offering a tool to capture thinking and reasoning in complex contexts, while offering researchers a way to collect evidence of this decision making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
TechTrends
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01076-y
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Learning Engineering Design Decision Tracking: Emergent Themes from Practitioners’ Work

Lauren Totino, Aaron Kessler
1 links
TechTrends
Design Education and Practice
article

Exploring Learning Engineering Design Decision Tracking: Emergent Themes from Practitioners’ Work

Lauren Totino, Aaron Kessler
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines design decisions that were written down and enacted by learning design practitioners across 18 projects at a postsecondary institution. Through emergent coding of decisions recorded in a Learning Engineering Evidence and Decision (LEED) tracker in situ, this research answers 3 questions: (1) how do practitioners track and cite sources of influence on design decisions, (2) how do practitioners communicate, revisit, and iterate these decisions throughout cycles of their design, and (3) when revisions were made to decisions, what sources of influence led to these changes? Findings indicate that practitioners record new and revised decisions while also tracking influences on these decisions that stem from their own experiences and from the specific project context. This work contributes to the support of learning design practitioners by offering a tool to capture thinking and reasoning in complex contexts, while offering researchers a way to collect evidence of this decision making.

TechTrendsVol. 69(4)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.