Feasibility and Effects of Implementing Multimodal Prehabilitation Before Cytoreductive Surgery in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: The Gynofit Multicenter Study

<b>Background</b>: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS), in combination with chemotherapy, is the main treatment for advanced-stage ovarian cancer. In vulnerable patients, this extensive surgery has a high complication risk and may lead to clinical decline. There is emerging evidence that prehabilitation could be valuable in optimizing the patient's condition prior to cytoreductive surgery, as is shown in colorectal surgery. However, there is limited evidence in gynecologic oncology. The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and effects of implementing multimodal prehabilitation before cytoreductive surgery in patients with ovarian cancer. <b>Methods</b>: In two Dutch hospitals, 46 patients with ovarian cancer were included during the study period, of whom 32 participated in a multimodal prehabilitation program before CRS. The programs included at least physiotherapy, dietary advice and intoxication cessation. The timing, extent and content of the programs differed. Feasibility was assessed by eligibility and participation rates and adherence to the physiotherapy program. Effectiveness was measured by differences in functional capacity, postoperative outcomes and tolerance to adjuvant chemotherapy. <b>Results</b>: Eligibility rates in both hospitals were 83% and 89%, and participation rates were 68% and 72%. Adherence to the physiotherapy program was moderate and only satisfactory in 55% and 63% of the patients. All fitness endpoint measurements improved compared to the baseline. No significant differences in postoperative outcomes were found between prehabilitation and control patients. Prehabilitation patients appeared to have better tolerance to adjuvant chemotherapy, with fewer dose reductions (21% vs. 73%, <i>p</i> = 0.017) and dose deferrals (39% vs. 46%, not significant) compared to the control group. <b>Conclusions</b>: The implementation of multimodal prehabilitation before CRS is feasible and effective in patients with ovarian cancer with respectable eligibility and participation rates, along with improved functional capacity, even during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17091393
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility and Effects of Implementing Multimodal Prehabilitation Before Cytoreductive Surgery in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: The Gynofit Multicenter Study

Janneke S. Hoogstad‐van Evert, Elize W. Lockhorst, Stella van der Graaff, Fedra Kort et al.
4 links
Cancers
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

Feasibility and Effects of Implementing Multimodal Prehabilitation Before Cytoreductive Surgery in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: The Gynofit Multicenter Study

Janneke S. Hoogstad‐van Evert, Elize W. Lockhorst, Stella van der Graaff, Fedra Kort, Huberdina P. M. Smedts, Gatske M. Nieuwenhuyzen-de Boer, Jennifer M. J. Schreinemakers, Tessa A. M. Backhuijs
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS), in combination with chemotherapy, is the main treatment for advanced-stage ovarian cancer. In vulnerable patients, this extensive surgery has a high complication risk and may lead to clinical decline. There is emerging evidence that prehabilitation could be valuable in optimizing the patient's condition prior to cytoreductive surgery, as is shown in colorectal surgery. However, there is limited evidence in gynecologic oncology. The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and effects of implementing multimodal prehabilitation before cytoreductive surgery in patients with ovarian cancer. <b>Methods</b>: In two Dutch hospitals, 46 patients with ovarian cancer were included during the study period, of whom 32 participated in a multimodal prehabilitation program before CRS. The programs included at least physiotherapy, dietary advice and intoxication cessation. The timing, extent and content of the programs differed. Feasibility was assessed by eligibility and participation rates and adherence to the physiotherapy program. Effectiveness was measured by differences in functional capacity, postoperative outcomes and tolerance to adjuvant chemotherapy. <b>Results</b>: Eligibility rates in both hospitals were 83% and 89%, and participation rates were 68% and 72%. Adherence to the physiotherapy program was moderate and only satisfactory in 55% and 63% of the patients. All fitness endpoint measurements improved compared to the baseline. No significant differences in postoperative outcomes were found between prehabilitation and control patients. Prehabilitation patients appeared to have better tolerance to adjuvant chemotherapy, with fewer dose reductions (21% vs. 73%, <i>p</i> = 0.017) and dose deferrals (39% vs. 46%, not significant) compared to the control group. <b>Conclusions</b>: The implementation of multimodal prehabilitation before CRS is feasible and effective in patients with ovarian cancer with respectable eligibility and participation rates, along with improved functional capacity, even during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

CancersVol. 17(9)
Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis (NL), Amphia Ziekenhuis (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.