Caledonian basement deformation related to oblique continent–continent collision in Scandinavia – insight gained from the interpretation of potential field data

The tectonic status, the mode of Caledonian deformation and the transport distance of the Precambrian units on the Fennoscandian Shield that constitute the so-called tectonic windows within the realm of the Scandinavian Caledonian nappe pile have long been a subject of dispute. It has been argued for several hundred kilometres of eastward transport for some of these tectonic units, whereas parautochthonous to autochthonous positions have also been suggested. In this contribution, geophysical data have been studied to shed light on this controversy. A dominant regional NNW–SSE to north–south structural grain of Precambrian origin extends beneath the Caledonian nappes. Indeed, similar structural patterns appear in several of the tectonic windows within the orogen. However, magnetic anomalies in southern Norway and the Nordland area show an apparent c. 90° counterclockwise rotation into the Caledonian trend along a line from Nordfjord in western Norway to Senja in northern Norway, whereas the anomalies in Finnmark (northernmost Norway), seem to be rotated clockwise along a line from Kvænangen to Porsangerfjorden. We suggest that this pattern extending through the Caledonides likely represents a boundary between two crustal domains with different Caledonian reworking. The eastern domain demonstrates less extensive modification during the Caledonian continent–continent collision. Some thrusts within basement windows in the eastern domain accommodated transport of a few tens of kilometres, revealing a parautochthonous status for most of these windows. Interpretations of aeromagnetic and gravity data have shown that the Caledonian nappes occurring along detachments extend to a maximum depth of c. 9 km below sea-level. The thickest nappe piles occur along the late Caledonian detachments. The eastern basement domain with minor Caledonian deformation has a thinner nappe stack (up to 4–5 km below). Our combined interpretations also show the need to modify the tectonostratigraphy of the northern Scandinavian Caledonides. The Lower Laksefjord Nappe in Finnmark, for instance, is interpreted as a parautochthonous window into the Precambrian basement and is not part of the Laksefjord Nappe Complex that has been transported hundreds of kilometres.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geological Society London Special Publications
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1144/sp557-2024-113
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Geological Modeling and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Caledonian basement deformation related to oblique continent–continent collision in Scandinavia – insight gained from the interpretation of potential field data

Arne Bjørlykke, Ane K. Engvik, Odleiv Olesen, Aziz Nasuti et al.
6 citations
Geological Society London Special Publications
Geological Modeling and Analysis
8.02
article

Caledonian basement deformation related to oblique continent–continent collision in Scandinavia – insight gained from the interpretation of potential field data

Arne Bjørlykke, Ane K. Engvik, Odleiv Olesen, Aziz Nasuti, Laurent Gernigon, Roy H. Gabrielsen, Trond Slagstad
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The tectonic status, the mode of Caledonian deformation and the transport distance of the Precambrian units on the Fennoscandian Shield that constitute the so-called tectonic windows within the realm of the Scandinavian Caledonian nappe pile have long been a subject of dispute. It has been argued for several hundred kilometres of eastward transport for some of these tectonic units, whereas parautochthonous to autochthonous positions have also been suggested. In this contribution, geophysical data have been studied to shed light on this controversy. A dominant regional NNW–SSE to north–south structural grain of Precambrian origin extends beneath the Caledonian nappes. Indeed, similar structural patterns appear in several of the tectonic windows within the orogen. However, magnetic anomalies in southern Norway and the Nordland area show an apparent c. 90° counterclockwise rotation into the Caledonian trend along a line from Nordfjord in western Norway to Senja in northern Norway, whereas the anomalies in Finnmark (northernmost Norway), seem to be rotated clockwise along a line from Kvænangen to Porsangerfjorden. We suggest that this pattern extending through the Caledonides likely represents a boundary between two crustal domains with different Caledonian reworking. The eastern domain demonstrates less extensive modification during the Caledonian continent–continent collision. Some thrusts within basement windows in the eastern domain accommodated transport of a few tens of kilometres, revealing a parautochthonous status for most of these windows. Interpretations of aeromagnetic and gravity data have shown that the Caledonian nappes occurring along detachments extend to a maximum depth of c. 9 km below sea-level. The thickest nappe piles occur along the late Caledonian detachments. The eastern basement domain with minor Caledonian deformation has a thinner nappe stack (up to 4–5 km below). Our combined interpretations also show the need to modify the tectonostratigraphy of the northern Scandinavian Caledonides. The Lower Laksefjord Nappe in Finnmark, for instance, is interpreted as a parautochthonous window into the Precambrian basement and is not part of the Laksefjord Nappe Complex that has been transported hundreds of kilometres.

Geological Society London Special PublicationsVol. 557(1)
Geological Survey of Norway (NO), University of Oslo (NO)
Norges Geologiske Undersøkelse
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Geological Modeling and Analysis
8.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.