Simplified Data-Driven Models for Gas Turbine Diagnostics

The maintenance of gas turbines relies a lot on gas path diagnostics (GPD), which includes two approaches. The first approach employs a physics-based model (thermodynamic model) to convert measurement shifts (deviations) induced by deterioration into fault parameters, which drastically simplify diagnostics. The second approach relies on data-driven models, makes diagnosis in the space of measurement deviations, and involves pattern recognition techniques. Although a thermodynamic model is an essential element of GPD, it has limitations. This model is a complex software critical to computer resources, and the computation sometimes does not converge. Therefore, it is difficult to use the model in online applications. Since the 1990s, we have developed many thermodynamic models for different engines. Since the 2000s, simplified data-driven models were investigated. This paper proposes to substitute a thermodynamic model for novel simplified data-driven models that have the same functionality, i.e., take into consideration the influence of both operating conditions and engine faults. The proposed models are formed and compared with the underlying thermodynamic model. To obtain a solid conclusion about these models, they are verified in twelve test cases formed by three test-case engines, two model types, and two approximation functions. Although the accuracy of the simplified models varies from 1.15% to 0.0082%, it was found acceptable even for the worst case. Thus, these simple-but-accurate models with the functionality of a physics-based model represent a good replacement for the latter. It is expected that the models will stimulate the further development of advanced diagnostic systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machines
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13050344
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fault Detection and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simplified Data-Driven Models for Gas Turbine Diagnostics

Iván González Castillo, Sergiy Yepifanov, Igor Loboda, Jesús Arias et al.
1 citations
Machines
Fault Detection and Control Systems
1.21
article

Simplified Data-Driven Models for Gas Turbine Diagnostics

Iván González Castillo, Sergiy Yepifanov, Igor Loboda, Jesús Arias, Juan Luis Pérez-Ruiz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The maintenance of gas turbines relies a lot on gas path diagnostics (GPD), which includes two approaches. The first approach employs a physics-based model (thermodynamic model) to convert measurement shifts (deviations) induced by deterioration into fault parameters, which drastically simplify diagnostics. The second approach relies on data-driven models, makes diagnosis in the space of measurement deviations, and involves pattern recognition techniques. Although a thermodynamic model is an essential element of GPD, it has limitations. This model is a complex software critical to computer resources, and the computation sometimes does not converge. Therefore, it is difficult to use the model in online applications. Since the 1990s, we have developed many thermodynamic models for different engines. Since the 2000s, simplified data-driven models were investigated. This paper proposes to substitute a thermodynamic model for novel simplified data-driven models that have the same functionality, i.e., take into consideration the influence of both operating conditions and engine faults. The proposed models are formed and compared with the underlying thermodynamic model. To obtain a solid conclusion about these models, they are verified in twelve test cases formed by three test-case engines, two model types, and two approximation functions. Although the accuracy of the simplified models varies from 1.15% to 0.0082%, it was found acceptable even for the worst case. Thus, these simple-but-accurate models with the functionality of a physics-based model represent a good replacement for the latter. It is expected that the models will stimulate the further development of advanced diagnostic systems.

MachinesVol. 13(5)
National Aerospace University – Kharkiv Aviation Institute (UA), Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas (MX), Instituto Tecnológico de Veracruz (MX), Instituto Tecnológico de Boca del Río, Instituto Politécnico Nacional (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Fault Detection and Control Systems
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.