Cost Effectiveness of Reusable Launch Vehicles Depending on the Payload Capacity

Recently, in the space market, there has been a rapid reduction in the launch price. The major reason for this is that a few commercial companies began to enter the space market about ten years ago, which has changed the space market from monopolization to competition and accelerated the adoption of commercial efficiency in technology and management. Also, SpaceX made a breakthrough by successfully recovering the first stage of its launch vehicle in 2016, thereby opening the door to reusable launch vehicles. They have declared their intention to significantly reduce satellite launch costs in the future by utilizing the potential of reusable launch vehicles. In this study, we calculate the total launch cost required to place a single satellite into Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and compare the launch costs for three different payload capacity scenarios, investigating how payload capacity affects the cost-effectiveness of reusable launch vehicles. The launch cost is broken down into development costs, production costs, reuse costs, operational costs, fixed costs, and insurance costs, with cost estimation equations utilized based on cost calculation models such as TRANSCOST.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aerospace
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12050364
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Rocket and propulsion systems research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost Effectiveness of Reusable Launch Vehicles Depending on the Payload Capacity

Jeong‐Yeol Choi, Min-Seon Jo, Si-Yoon Kang, Soo Seok Yang
6 citations
Aerospace
Rocket and propulsion systems research
29.96
article

Cost Effectiveness of Reusable Launch Vehicles Depending on the Payload Capacity

Jeong‐Yeol Choi, Min-Seon Jo, Si-Yoon Kang, Soo Seok Yang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Recently, in the space market, there has been a rapid reduction in the launch price. The major reason for this is that a few commercial companies began to enter the space market about ten years ago, which has changed the space market from monopolization to competition and accelerated the adoption of commercial efficiency in technology and management. Also, SpaceX made a breakthrough by successfully recovering the first stage of its launch vehicle in 2016, thereby opening the door to reusable launch vehicles. They have declared their intention to significantly reduce satellite launch costs in the future by utilizing the potential of reusable launch vehicles. In this study, we calculate the total launch cost required to place a single satellite into Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and compare the launch costs for three different payload capacity scenarios, investigating how payload capacity affects the cost-effectiveness of reusable launch vehicles. The launch cost is broken down into development costs, production costs, reuse costs, operational costs, fixed costs, and insurance costs, with cost estimation equations utilized based on cost calculation models such as TRANSCOST.

AerospaceVol. 12(5)
Korea Aerospace Research Institute (KR), Pusan National University (KR)
National Research Foundation of Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Rocket and propulsion systems research
29.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.