University-Government-Foundation Collaboration on Arms Control and Security Policy in the United States from Truman to Trump

Abstract The relationship between the United States government, private foundations, and university-based researchers working on peace and security policy has evolved over time. Since the end of World War II we can identify four main phases: (1) secret government funding into the 1960s; (2) a Golden Age of foundation support in the 1970s and 1980s; (3) decline of support after the end of the Cold War; (4) a revival of interest in the wake of the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001, with government funding through the Pentagon’s Minerva grants and new foundation support representing an unusual alliance between leftwing and realist critics of US military expansionism on the one hand and rightwing neoisolationists on the other. To illustrate these phases, the article draws, among others, on documents from Cornell and Harvard universities and materials from the Ford, MacArthur, and Koch foundations. It represents an idiosyncratic account, based in part on the author’s experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Peace Economics Peace Science and Public Policy
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2025-0027
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

University-Government-Foundation Collaboration on Arms Control and Security Policy in the United States from Truman to Trump

Matthew Evangelista
Peace Economics Peace Science and Public Policy
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

University-Government-Foundation Collaboration on Arms Control and Security Policy in the United States from Truman to Trump

Matthew Evangelista
article en

Abstract

Abstract The relationship between the United States government, private foundations, and university-based researchers working on peace and security policy has evolved over time. Since the end of World War II we can identify four main phases: (1) secret government funding into the 1960s; (2) a Golden Age of foundation support in the 1970s and 1980s; (3) decline of support after the end of the Cold War; (4) a revival of interest in the wake of the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001, with government funding through the Pentagon’s Minerva grants and new foundation support representing an unusual alliance between leftwing and realist critics of US military expansionism on the one hand and rightwing neoisolationists on the other. To illustrate these phases, the article draws, among others, on documents from Cornell and Harvard universities and materials from the Ford, MacArthur, and Koch foundations. It represents an idiosyncratic account, based in part on the author’s experiences.

Peace Economics Peace Science and Public PolicyVol. 31(2)
Cornell University (US)
Carnegie Corporation of New York, John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.