Typical Electron-Withdrawing Groups Are <i>ortho</i>, <i>meta</i>-Directors Rather than <i>meta</i>-Directors in Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution

Electron-withdrawing groups are traditionally considered <i>meta</i>-directing in aromatic substitution reactions. However, when the pre-existing substituent is a π-acceptor, both experiment and calculation indicate that substantial amounts of <i>ortho</i> as well as <i>meta</i> substitution occur, with very little <i>para</i> reactivity. A simple perturbative MO argument rationalizes this finding. It is therefore suggested that these substituents are best understood as <i>ortho</i>, <i>meta</i>-directors, with a preference for <i>meta</i>, just as electron-donating groups are considered <i>ortho</i>, <i>para</i>-directors, with a preference for <i>para</i>.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.5c00426
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Typical Electron-Withdrawing Groups Are ortho, meta-Directors Rather than meta-Directors in Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution

Paul R. Rablen
7 citations
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure
6.55
article

Typical Electron-Withdrawing Groups Are ortho, meta-Directors Rather than meta-Directors in Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution

Paul R. Rablen
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Electron-withdrawing groups are traditionally considered <i>meta</i>-directing in aromatic substitution reactions. However, when the pre-existing substituent is a π-acceptor, both experiment and calculation indicate that substantial amounts of <i>ortho</i> as well as <i>meta</i> substitution occur, with very little <i>para</i> reactivity. A simple perturbative MO argument rationalizes this finding. It is therefore suggested that these substituents are best understood as <i>ortho</i>, <i>meta</i>-directors, with a preference for <i>meta</i>, just as electron-donating groups are considered <i>ortho</i>, <i>para</i>-directors, with a preference for <i>para</i>.

The Journal of Organic ChemistryVol. 90(17)
Swarthmore College (US)
Swarthmore College
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure
6.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.