Electrolyte disorders in the critically ill: a retrospective analysis

Several electrolyte disorders have been associated with adverse outcomes, but data on the coincidence of multiple disorders, interactions between different electrolytes and the impact of substitution on electrolyte levels are scarce. This study aimed to describe electrolyte disorders' prevalence, incidence, and interaction in a consecutive cohort of ICU patients. Single-center retrospective study, including 2,056 consecutive adult ICU patients. Patients without laboratory data, those declining participation, and those receiving renal replacement therapy were excluded. Electrolyte levels and intravenous electrolyte administration were analyzed during the first 96 h after ICU admission using descriptive statistics, regression models and AUC-ROC analysis. Of 2392 admitted patients, 2056 were included. On admission, 312 patients (15.2%) had no electrolytes measured, 316 (15.4%) did not have any electrolyte disorder, 643 (31.3%) had one disorder, and 785 (38.2%) had multiple disorders. The most common electrolyte disorders on admission were hyperchloremia (56.0%, 977/1,744), hyperkalemia (18.7%, 326/1,744), hypophosphatemia (16.8%, 293/1,744), and hyperphosphatemia (16.4%, 286/1,744). Most patients (77.4%, 1,592/2,056) developed at least one new disorder during their ICU stay. A considerable number of patients (19.7%, 344/1,744) experienced electrolyte disorders in both directions ('hypo' and 'hyper') during their ICU stay. Linear regression models revealed that changes in one electrolyte level are often associated with alterations in other electrolyte levels. Most patients (99.2% 2,039/2,056) received intravenous electrolytes. Electrolyte overcorrection occurred in 89/365 patients (24.4%) for hypokalemia and 50/575 patients (8.7%) for hypophosphatemia. AUC-ROC analysis revealed cut-off points with the highest sensitivity and specificity at 30 mmol of potassium within 6 h and 45 mmol of phosphate within 15 h. Electrolyte disorders are highly prevalent in ICU patients, with significant co-incidence and interplay between these disorders. Knowledge regarding overcorrection risks may inform safe electrolyte administration protocols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98677-7
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Electrolyte and hormonal disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.07

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electrolyte disorders in the critically ill: a retrospective analysis

Andreas Bloch, Adrian Regli, Kaspar F. Bachmann, Benjamin Hess et al.
4 citations
Scientific Reports
Electrolyte and hormonal disorders
6.07
article

Electrolyte disorders in the critically ill: a retrospective analysis

Andreas Bloch, Adrian Regli, Kaspar F. Bachmann, Benjamin Hess, Annika Reintam Blaser, Merli Koitmäe
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Several electrolyte disorders have been associated with adverse outcomes, but data on the coincidence of multiple disorders, interactions between different electrolytes and the impact of substitution on electrolyte levels are scarce. This study aimed to describe electrolyte disorders' prevalence, incidence, and interaction in a consecutive cohort of ICU patients. Single-center retrospective study, including 2,056 consecutive adult ICU patients. Patients without laboratory data, those declining participation, and those receiving renal replacement therapy were excluded. Electrolyte levels and intravenous electrolyte administration were analyzed during the first 96 h after ICU admission using descriptive statistics, regression models and AUC-ROC analysis. Of 2392 admitted patients, 2056 were included. On admission, 312 patients (15.2%) had no electrolytes measured, 316 (15.4%) did not have any electrolyte disorder, 643 (31.3%) had one disorder, and 785 (38.2%) had multiple disorders. The most common electrolyte disorders on admission were hyperchloremia (56.0%, 977/1,744), hyperkalemia (18.7%, 326/1,744), hypophosphatemia (16.8%, 293/1,744), and hyperphosphatemia (16.4%, 286/1,744). Most patients (77.4%, 1,592/2,056) developed at least one new disorder during their ICU stay. A considerable number of patients (19.7%, 344/1,744) experienced electrolyte disorders in both directions ('hypo' and 'hyper') during their ICU stay. Linear regression models revealed that changes in one electrolyte level are often associated with alterations in other electrolyte levels. Most patients (99.2% 2,039/2,056) received intravenous electrolytes. Electrolyte overcorrection occurred in 89/365 patients (24.4%) for hypokalemia and 50/575 patients (8.7%) for hypophosphatemia. AUC-ROC analysis revealed cut-off points with the highest sensitivity and specificity at 30 mmol of potassium within 6 h and 45 mmol of phosphate within 15 h. Electrolyte disorders are highly prevalent in ICU patients, with significant co-incidence and interplay between these disorders. Knowledge regarding overcorrection risks may inform safe electrolyte administration protocols.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Lucerne (CH), The University of Western Australia (AU), Fiona Stanley Hospital (AU), University Hospital of Bern (CH), University of Tartu (EE), The University of Notre Dame Australia (AU)
Eesti Teadusagentuur, Tartu Ülikool
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Electrolyte and hormonal disorders
6.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.