How does the extracellular matrix affect the rigidity of an embedded spheroid?

Cellularized tissue and polymer networks can both transition from floppy to rigid as a function of their control parameters, and, yet, the two systems often mechanically interact, which could affect their respective rigidities. To study this interaction, we consider a vertex model with surface tension embedded in a spring network in two dimensions. We identify two regimes with different global spheroid shapes and governed by the pressure resulting from competition between surface tension and tension in the network. In the first regime, the tissue remains compact, while in the second, a cavitation-like instability leads to the emergence of gaps at the tissue-network interface. Intriguingly, compression of the tissue promotes fluidization, while tension promotes cellular alignment and rigidification with the mechanisms driving rigidification differing on either side of the instability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. E
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.111.044410
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How does the extracellular matrix affect the rigidity of an embedded spheroid?

Amanda Parker, J. M. Schwarz, M. Lisa Manning, Mauro Marchetti
3 citations
Physical review. E
Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
3.45
article

How does the extracellular matrix affect the rigidity of an embedded spheroid?

Amanda Parker, J. M. Schwarz, M. Lisa Manning, Mauro Marchetti
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Cellularized tissue and polymer networks can both transition from floppy to rigid as a function of their control parameters, and, yet, the two systems often mechanically interact, which could affect their respective rigidities. To study this interaction, we consider a vertex model with surface tension embedded in a spring network in two dimensions. We identify two regimes with different global spheroid shapes and governed by the pressure resulting from competition between surface tension and tension in the network. In the first regime, the tissue remains compact, while in the second, a cavitation-like instability leads to the emergence of gaps at the tissue-network interface. Intriguingly, compression of the tissue promotes fluidization, while tension promotes cellular alignment and rigidification with the mechanisms driving rigidification differing on either side of the instability.

Physical review. EVol. 111(4)
University of California, Santa Barbara (US), Indian Creek Farm (US), Syracuse University (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
3.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.