Referral Times and Time-to-Treat Gynecological Cancer Prior to and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Introduction/Purpose: Considering the significant impact of gynecological cancers on women’s health, timely treatment plays a crucial role in minimizing morbidity and mortality. Endometrial cancer (EC) stands as the most prevalent gynecologic cancer, while ovarian cancer (OC), although less common, carries a higher fatality rate. The referral process from primary care practitioners (i.e., Ob/Gyn and family medicine physicians) and emergency medicine physicians to gynecologic oncologists (Gyn/Onc) serves as a vital link in the healthcare system, ensuring prompt care. Delays in referrals, particularly for EC and OC, result in assessment and treatment delays and ultimately lead to suboptimal outcomes. The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic prompted alterations in healthcare practices to reduce exposure risks. Although some changes have persisted post stay-at-home orders and mask mandates, the full impact of resource triaging during the pandemic on gynecologic cancer care remains uncertain. This study aims to investigate referral times and the time-to-treat EC and OC. Our hypothesis posits that during-COVID-19, delays in treatment for EC and OC patients occurred. Our specific focus was to assess the influence of COVID-19 on time from transfer of care and time to surgery. Methods: This retrospective chart review included women undergoing surgical management for EC or suspicion of OC at SIU School of Medicine, Department of Ob/Gyn, Division of Gynecologic Oncology (IRB# 23-343). Subjects seen by the Gyn/Onc between January 1, 2019 and March 11, 2020 were categorized as ‘pre-COVID-19’ and those presenting between March 12, 2020 and May 30, 2021 were considered ‘during-COVID-19’. Patients attending any appointments for their cancer work-up, including surgery, that spanned both the pre- and during-COVID-19 timeframes were excluded. Date of presentation to the referring physician, date of referral to the Gyn/Onc, date of surgery, insurance status, race, age, BMI, gravidity, parity, comorbidities and cancer grade were extracted from the Electronic Health Record. Rural-urban commuting area (RUCA) codes were utilized to determine subjects’ geolocation in order to establish potential delays due to differences in access to transportation or commute time. Chi-square (for categorical variables) and T-test or Mann-Whitney U-test (for numerical variables) were utilized for comparisons. Results: A total 151 patients were included in this study. Of these, 58% presented for surgical evaluation pre-COVID-19 and 42% were during-COVID-19. There were no significant differences (all p-values ≥ 0.05) between the pre- and during-COVID-19 groups, respectively, in regards to: Age at time of surgery (62.3 ± 12.0 vs. 60.0 ± 12.6 years); Insurance type (Medicare: 51% vs. 39%, Medicaid: 19% vs 23%, Commercial: 27% vs. 32%, Uninsured: 2% vs. 6%); RUCA codes (Metro: 51% vs. 49%, Micro: 18% vs. 25%, Rural/Small: 31% vs. 26%); Race (White: 90% vs. 79%, African American: 5% vs. 5%, Asian: 0% vs. 3%, American Indian/Alaskan Native: 1% vs. 0%, Other/declined: 5% vs. 13%); BMI (37.0 ± 10.1 vs. 36.2 ± 10.0); Comorbidities at time of presentation (95% vs. 94%), Gravidity (2.5 ± 2.2 vs. 2.1 ± 1.7) or Parity (2.0 ± 1.6 vs. 1.9 ± 1.6). The cohort during-COVID-19 was found to have significantly shorter ‘time from symptom onset to referral’ compared to the pre-COVID-19 group (median [range]: 34 [7 – 111] days vs. 42 [6 – 298] days, respectively, p=0.009). In addition, there was a significantly shorter time period from the time of referral to surgery (8 [2 – 123] days vs.13 [2 – 125] days, respectively, p=0.006). Conclusions: Despite homogeneous patient populations prior to and during the pandemic era, these findings indicate a noteworthy reduction in both the time to transfer care and the duration from referral to surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Although various factors may contribute to this outcome (i.e., elective surgeries were cancelled allowing more operating room access for cancer cases), our findings suggest that the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic compelled the medical field to enhance efficiency in the health care delivery system. Further investigation is necessary to understand the specific modifications in the referral and time-to-treat processes that have resulted in shorter wait times. A thorough exploration of these changes has the potential to unveil strategies pertinent to improving timeliness of care and enhancing outcomes in the surgical treatment of gynecologic cancers, specifically EC and OC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
North American Proceedings in Gynecology and Obstetrics - Supplemental
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54053/001c.132177
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Referral Times and Time-to-Treat Gynecological Cancer Prior to and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Laurent Brard, Teresa Wilson, Paula Díaz‐Sylvester, Stella Udoetuk et al.
North American Proceedings in Gynecology and Obstetrics - Supplemental
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
article

Referral Times and Time-to-Treat Gynecological Cancer Prior to and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Laurent Brard, Teresa Wilson, Paula Díaz‐Sylvester, Stella Udoetuk, Kathleen Groesch, Kristin R. Delfino, Meta Damkjær Nielsen, J. Ricardo Loret de Mola, Amber Bottrell
article en

Abstract

Introduction/Purpose: Considering the significant impact of gynecological cancers on women’s health, timely treatment plays a crucial role in minimizing morbidity and mortality. Endometrial cancer (EC) stands as the most prevalent gynecologic cancer, while ovarian cancer (OC), although less common, carries a higher fatality rate. The referral process from primary care practitioners (i.e., Ob/Gyn and family medicine physicians) and emergency medicine physicians to gynecologic oncologists (Gyn/Onc) serves as a vital link in the healthcare system, ensuring prompt care. Delays in referrals, particularly for EC and OC, result in assessment and treatment delays and ultimately lead to suboptimal outcomes. The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic prompted alterations in healthcare practices to reduce exposure risks. Although some changes have persisted post stay-at-home orders and mask mandates, the full impact of resource triaging during the pandemic on gynecologic cancer care remains uncertain. This study aims to investigate referral times and the time-to-treat EC and OC. Our hypothesis posits that during-COVID-19, delays in treatment for EC and OC patients occurred. Our specific focus was to assess the influence of COVID-19 on time from transfer of care and time to surgery. Methods: This retrospective chart review included women undergoing surgical management for EC or suspicion of OC at SIU School of Medicine, Department of Ob/Gyn, Division of Gynecologic Oncology (IRB# 23-343). Subjects seen by the Gyn/Onc between January 1, 2019 and March 11, 2020 were categorized as ‘pre-COVID-19’ and those presenting between March 12, 2020 and May 30, 2021 were considered ‘during-COVID-19’. Patients attending any appointments for their cancer work-up, including surgery, that spanned both the pre- and during-COVID-19 timeframes were excluded. Date of presentation to the referring physician, date of referral to the Gyn/Onc, date of surgery, insurance status, race, age, BMI, gravidity, parity, comorbidities and cancer grade were extracted from the Electronic Health Record. Rural-urban commuting area (RUCA) codes were utilized to determine subjects’ geolocation in order to establish potential delays due to differences in access to transportation or commute time. Chi-square (for categorical variables) and T-test or Mann-Whitney U-test (for numerical variables) were utilized for comparisons. Results: A total 151 patients were included in this study. Of these, 58% presented for surgical evaluation pre-COVID-19 and 42% were during-COVID-19. There were no significant differences (all p-values ≥ 0.05) between the pre- and during-COVID-19 groups, respectively, in regards to: Age at time of surgery (62.3 ± 12.0 vs. 60.0 ± 12.6 years); Insurance type (Medicare: 51% vs. 39%, Medicaid: 19% vs 23%, Commercial: 27% vs. 32%, Uninsured: 2% vs. 6%); RUCA codes (Metro: 51% vs. 49%, Micro: 18% vs. 25%, Rural/Small: 31% vs. 26%); Race (White: 90% vs. 79%, African American: 5% vs. 5%, Asian: 0% vs. 3%, American Indian/Alaskan Native: 1% vs. 0%, Other/declined: 5% vs. 13%); BMI (37.0 ± 10.1 vs. 36.2 ± 10.0); Comorbidities at time of presentation (95% vs. 94%), Gravidity (2.5 ± 2.2 vs. 2.1 ± 1.7) or Parity (2.0 ± 1.6 vs. 1.9 ± 1.6). The cohort during-COVID-19 was found to have significantly shorter ‘time from symptom onset to referral’ compared to the pre-COVID-19 group (median [range]: 34 [7 – 111] days vs. 42 [6 – 298] days, respectively, p=0.009). In addition, there was a significantly shorter time period from the time of referral to surgery (8 [2 – 123] days vs.13 [2 – 125] days, respectively, p=0.006). Conclusions: Despite homogeneous patient populations prior to and during the pandemic era, these findings indicate a noteworthy reduction in both the time to transfer care and the duration from referral to surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Although various factors may contribute to this outcome (i.e., elective surgeries were cancelled allowing more operating room access for cancer cases), our findings suggest that the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic compelled the medical field to enhance efficiency in the health care delivery system. Further investigation is necessary to understand the specific modifications in the referral and time-to-treat processes that have resulted in shorter wait times. A thorough exploration of these changes has the potential to unveil strategies pertinent to improving timeliness of care and enhancing outcomes in the surgical treatment of gynecologic cancers, specifically EC and OC.

North American Proceedings in Gynecology and Obstetrics - Supplemental
Southern Illinois University School of Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.