Chatbots in education: Outperforming students but perceived as less trustworthy

• Care plans labeled as chatbot-generated experience decreased trust. • ChatGPT outperforms students alone and students using ChatGPT in care plan creation. • Discrepancy between perceived trustworthiness and actual chatbot performance. In recent years, chatbots have emerged as potential individual assistance systems in educational settings. However, their successful implementation depends on their ability to deliver high-quality outcomes and gain students’ trust. Against this background, this study investigated the perceived trustworthiness of chatbots in nursing education and whether this trust was justified in light of chatbots’ actual performance in care plan creation. We conducted a study with 189 vocational nursing students who created medical care plans under two conditions: without ChatGPT (GPT-4) and with ChatGPT assistance. Additionally, ChatGPT was used to develop care plans without student involvement. Expert evaluations of these care plans allowed us to compare quality across conditions. We also examined students’ trust by having them evaluate another care plan before and after experimentally manipulating information about its source (chatbot or peer-generated). Statistical analyses revealed that source disclosure significantly affected students’ trust: Care plans believed to be chatbot-generated experienced a significant decrease in trust, while those attributed to peers showed no significant change. However, analyses of expert evaluations showed that ChatGPT-generated plans were of higher quality than those created by students, even when students used ChatGPT assistance. This discrepancy between perceived trustworthiness and actual performance of chatbots indicates that students’ skepticism toward chatbot-generated content is, to some extent, exaggerated. While ChatGPT can enhance students’ care plan quality, our findings emphasize the importance of addressing trust issues in educational settings where chatbots are implemented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102373
Citations
3
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chatbots in education: Outperforming students but perceived as less trustworthy

Fabian Wolff, Daniel Friemert, Martin Laun, E Wyss et al.
3 citations
Contemporary Educational Psychology
AI in Service Interactions
7.44
article

Chatbots in education: Outperforming students but perceived as less trustworthy

Fabian Wolff, Daniel Friemert, Martin Laun, E Wyss, Leonard Puderbach, Ulrich Hartmann, Katharina Hirt
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Care plans labeled as chatbot-generated experience decreased trust. • ChatGPT outperforms students alone and students using ChatGPT in care plan creation. • Discrepancy between perceived trustworthiness and actual chatbot performance. In recent years, chatbots have emerged as potential individual assistance systems in educational settings. However, their successful implementation depends on their ability to deliver high-quality outcomes and gain students’ trust. Against this background, this study investigated the perceived trustworthiness of chatbots in nursing education and whether this trust was justified in light of chatbots’ actual performance in care plan creation. We conducted a study with 189 vocational nursing students who created medical care plans under two conditions: without ChatGPT (GPT-4) and with ChatGPT assistance. Additionally, ChatGPT was used to develop care plans without student involvement. Expert evaluations of these care plans allowed us to compare quality across conditions. We also examined students’ trust by having them evaluate another care plan before and after experimentally manipulating information about its source (chatbot or peer-generated). Statistical analyses revealed that source disclosure significantly affected students’ trust: Care plans believed to be chatbot-generated experienced a significant decrease in trust, while those attributed to peers showed no significant change. However, analyses of expert evaluations showed that ChatGPT-generated plans were of higher quality than those created by students, even when students used ChatGPT assistance. This discrepancy between perceived trustworthiness and actual performance of chatbots indicates that students’ skepticism toward chatbot-generated content is, to some extent, exaggerated. While ChatGPT can enhance students’ care plan quality, our findings emphasize the importance of addressing trust issues in educational settings where chatbots are implemented.

Contemporary Educational PsychologyVol. 81
Koblenz University of Applied Sciences (DE), Bielefeld University (DE), Hochschule Bielefeld (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
AI in Service Interactions
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.