Oral fluid collection in wild boar: A field protocol

Traditional wildlife sampling methods have limitations in providing a well-distributed, timely and accurate disease surveillance in wildlife. We developed a field protocol for collecting wild boar (Sus scrofa) oral fluid samples for non-invasive active disease surveillance using environmental ropes. We deployed ropes in field settings and tested the rope-sampled oral fluids for antibodies against Mycobacterium bovis and closely related members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC). Oral fluid samples were collected from three wild boars populations in Spain with endemic tuberculosis across two seasons with contrasting natural food availability. Additionally, we studied the effect of placing the ropes close to aggregation points and of impregnating the ropes with corn powder. The results suggested that installing environmental ropes in summer, close to feeders or aggregation points, and baited with corn powder significantly increases the proportion of bitten ropes. No significant differences were observed in the effectiveness of ropes for oral fluid sampling across the three study sites. The average rate of antibody detection by ELISA was 38 % (range 34-45 %) of the bitten ropes. This method appears to be both precise and sensitive in detecting antibodies against MTC in oral fluid samples collected from environmental ropes, making it a potentially valuable tool for early detection and monitoring of MTC circulation. This noninvasive sampling method can easily be adapted for other relevant diseases of wild suids including African swine fever. Therefore, environmental ropes represent an effective, inexpensive, flexible, environmentally friendly, and noninvasive alternative for active wildlife disease surveillance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Veterinary Journal
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2025.106362
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Animal Diversity and Health Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oral fluid collection in wild boar: A field protocol

José Á. Barasona, David Relimpio, Christian Gortázar, Aleksandra Kosowska et al.
1 citations
The Veterinary Journal
Animal Diversity and Health Studies
1.16
article

Oral fluid collection in wild boar: A field protocol

José Á. Barasona, David Relimpio, Christian Gortázar, Aleksandra Kosowska, Sandra Barroso‐Arévalo, Daniel De Antonio-Gómez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Traditional wildlife sampling methods have limitations in providing a well-distributed, timely and accurate disease surveillance in wildlife. We developed a field protocol for collecting wild boar (Sus scrofa) oral fluid samples for non-invasive active disease surveillance using environmental ropes. We deployed ropes in field settings and tested the rope-sampled oral fluids for antibodies against Mycobacterium bovis and closely related members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC). Oral fluid samples were collected from three wild boars populations in Spain with endemic tuberculosis across two seasons with contrasting natural food availability. Additionally, we studied the effect of placing the ropes close to aggregation points and of impregnating the ropes with corn powder. The results suggested that installing environmental ropes in summer, close to feeders or aggregation points, and baited with corn powder significantly increases the proportion of bitten ropes. No significant differences were observed in the effectiveness of ropes for oral fluid sampling across the three study sites. The average rate of antibody detection by ELISA was 38 % (range 34-45 %) of the bitten ropes. This method appears to be both precise and sensitive in detecting antibodies against MTC in oral fluid samples collected from environmental ropes, making it a potentially valuable tool for early detection and monitoring of MTC circulation. This noninvasive sampling method can easily be adapted for other relevant diseases of wild suids including African swine fever. Therefore, environmental ropes represent an effective, inexpensive, flexible, environmentally friendly, and noninvasive alternative for active wildlife disease surveillance.

The Veterinary JournalVol. 312
Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (ES), Department of Animal Health (VN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Animal Diversity and Health Studies
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.