Construction and evaluation of different glioblastoma prognosis scores based on gene expression databases

Introduction: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumor, and the prognosis of GBM pa-tients is unfavorable.More studies are needed to develop new prognostic tools for predicting GBM patients' prognosis.This study aims to construct generisk score (GRS) models based on gene expression databases.Methods: Genomic data of GBM were downloaded from the CGGA, TCGA, MYO, and CPTAC.Patients were divided into two groups with overall survival (OS) of more or less than 15 months.Top 31 genes from our previous study and clinical data such as age, gender, and IDH wildtype/mutant were used to develop two GRS models.Cox methods in SPSS v26 were applied in this study.Results: A total of 551 (334 male, mean age 55.5 13.3 years) cases were used.Fourgene (TGFB1, CCL2, CD274, and TNFRSF1A; from the combination of four databases) and eight-gene (EGFR, TGFB1, SPP1, AGT, TNFRSF1A, CDK1, FOXO3, and CEP55; from CGGA) risk scores were developed.Two models could separate OS samples into high and low-risk groups, and AUCs of 0.984 and, 0.998 were achieved that showed excellent discriminating power at the training set (all: p < 0.0001).For the 8-GRS model, the OS of cases in the high-risk group was poorer than that in the low-risk group when used on another's datasets at the validation set, however, it was not significant.Conclusion: Four-and eight-gene prognostic signatures were identified and constructed to predict OS in GBM patients.This study may provide innovative insights into the treatment of GBM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiology and Pharmacology
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61186/phypha.29.1.35
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Construction and evaluation of different glioblastoma prognosis scores based on gene expression databases

Abolhassan Ahmadiani, Parisa Azimi
Physiology and Pharmacology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Construction and evaluation of different glioblastoma prognosis scores based on gene expression databases

Abolhassan Ahmadiani, Parisa Azimi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumor, and the prognosis of GBM pa-tients is unfavorable.More studies are needed to develop new prognostic tools for predicting GBM patients' prognosis.This study aims to construct generisk score (GRS) models based on gene expression databases.Methods: Genomic data of GBM were downloaded from the CGGA, TCGA, MYO, and CPTAC.Patients were divided into two groups with overall survival (OS) of more or less than 15 months.Top 31 genes from our previous study and clinical data such as age, gender, and IDH wildtype/mutant were used to develop two GRS models.Cox methods in SPSS v26 were applied in this study.Results: A total of 551 (334 male, mean age 55.5 13.3 years) cases were used.Fourgene (TGFB1, CCL2, CD274, and TNFRSF1A; from the combination of four databases) and eight-gene (EGFR, TGFB1, SPP1, AGT, TNFRSF1A, CDK1, FOXO3, and CEP55; from CGGA) risk scores were developed.Two models could separate OS samples into high and low-risk groups, and AUCs of 0.984 and, 0.998 were achieved that showed excellent discriminating power at the training set (all: p < 0.0001).For the 8-GRS model, the OS of cases in the high-risk group was poorer than that in the low-risk group when used on another's datasets at the validation set, however, it was not significant.Conclusion: Four-and eight-gene prognostic signatures were identified and constructed to predict OS in GBM patients.This study may provide innovative insights into the treatment of GBM.

Physiology and PharmacologyVol. 29(1)
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR)
National Institute for Medical Research Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.