Comparative Analyais of CNN Architectures for Deep Fake Detection

DeepFake technology, driven by advanced generative models, threatens online authenticity and privacy. This paper presents a comparative analysis of three convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures—VGGFace16, DenseNet-121, and a custom CNN model—for DeepFake image detection. The study utilizes the 140k Faces Dataset, comprising 70,000 real and 70,000 synthetic images, and the Real and Fake Face Detection Dataset from Yonsei University, ensuring a diverse and well-balanced training set while accounting for computational constraints. Feature extraction from the final convolutional layers, dimensionality reduction via Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and classification with a Support Vector Machine (SVM) using a polynomial kernel form the core methodology. DenseNet-121 achieved the highest accuracy (97%) on grayscaled images, while the augmented custom CNN balanced accuracy (86%) and interpretability, attaining a Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) score of 0.953. PCA visualizations confirmed the models’ ability to distinguish real from fake images. The findings underscore dataset selection’s role in model performance and the necessity of resource-efficient training. Future work will expand dataset diversity, explore cross-dataset validation, and leverage advanced computational resources to enhance generalization, contributing to more robust DeepFake detection systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/isacc65211.2025.10969171
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Media Forensic Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analyais of CNN Architectures for Deep Fake Detection

Sachin Chavan, Sunita Barve, Pranav Wani, Siddhesh Paithankar et al.
1 citations
Digital Media Forensic Detection
1.28
article

Comparative Analyais of CNN Architectures for Deep Fake Detection

Sachin Chavan, Sunita Barve, Pranav Wani, Siddhesh Paithankar, Diptee Ghusse
article en
1 citations

Abstract

DeepFake technology, driven by advanced generative models, threatens online authenticity and privacy. This paper presents a comparative analysis of three convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures—VGGFace16, DenseNet-121, and a custom CNN model—for DeepFake image detection. The study utilizes the 140k Faces Dataset, comprising 70,000 real and 70,000 synthetic images, and the Real and Fake Face Detection Dataset from Yonsei University, ensuring a diverse and well-balanced training set while accounting for computational constraints. Feature extraction from the final convolutional layers, dimensionality reduction via Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and classification with a Support Vector Machine (SVM) using a polynomial kernel form the core methodology. DenseNet-121 achieved the highest accuracy (97%) on grayscaled images, while the augmented custom CNN balanced accuracy (86%) and interpretability, attaining a Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) score of 0.953. PCA visualizations confirmed the models’ ability to distinguish real from fake images. The findings underscore dataset selection’s role in model performance and the necessity of resource-efficient training. Future work will expand dataset diversity, explore cross-dataset validation, and leverage advanced computational resources to enhance generalization, contributing to more robust DeepFake detection systems.

MIT Art, Design and Technology University (IN), MIT Academy of Engineering
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Digital Media Forensic Detection
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analyais of CNN Architectures for Deep Fake Detection — Sachin Chavan, Sunita Barve, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS