Unraveling the Dynamics of Corporate Dividend Policy: Evidence from the Property-Liability Insurance Industry

What drives corporate dividend policy remains an unsettled issue, largely due to data limitations, as many privately held firms do not need to disclose their financial reports publicly. We examine and compare the dividend policies of firms with three distinct ownership structures—publicly held stock insurers, privately held stock insurers, and mutual insurers—within the U.S. property-liability insurance industry. Our findings indicate that publicly held insurers are more likely to distribute dividends and tend to pay higher dividends compared to privately held insurers, with mutual insurers paying the least in the matched sample. We found that mutual insurers’ dividend policies are more sensitive to cash flow, whereas stock insurers’ policies are more responsive to profits. We show that private insurers have significantly less smoothness in dividend policies. Our findings highlight the significant role that ownership structure plays in shaping corporate dividend policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of risk and financial management
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18050222
Primary Topic
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unraveling the Dynamics of Corporate Dividend Policy: Evidence from the Property-Liability Insurance Industry

Haibo Yao, Ning Wang, Michael Casey, Yiling Deng
Journal of risk and financial management
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
article

Unraveling the Dynamics of Corporate Dividend Policy: Evidence from the Property-Liability Insurance Industry

Haibo Yao, Ning Wang, Michael Casey, Yiling Deng
article en

Abstract

What drives corporate dividend policy remains an unsettled issue, largely due to data limitations, as many privately held firms do not need to disclose their financial reports publicly. We examine and compare the dividend policies of firms with three distinct ownership structures—publicly held stock insurers, privately held stock insurers, and mutual insurers—within the U.S. property-liability insurance industry. Our findings indicate that publicly held insurers are more likely to distribute dividends and tend to pay higher dividends compared to privately held insurers, with mutual insurers paying the least in the matched sample. We found that mutual insurers’ dividend policies are more sensitive to cash flow, whereas stock insurers’ policies are more responsive to profits. We show that private insurers have significantly less smoothness in dividend policies. Our findings highlight the significant role that ownership structure plays in shaping corporate dividend policies.

Journal of risk and financial managementVol. 18(5)
University of Central Arkansas (US), Conway School of Landscape Design (US), University of North Georgia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.