Comparison of Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Ceramic Inlay Restorations Fabricated Through Model Scanner, Intraoral Scanner, and CBCT Scans

Background and Objectives: CBCT images have been successfully used for CAD/CAM crown restorations; however, their use for ceramic inlay restorations remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM ceramic inlay restorations fabricated using intraoral scanner, model scanner, and CBCT data. Materials and Methods: Inlay preparations were performed on 11 mandibular molar typodont teeth. The teeth were scanned using an intraoral scanner, an extraoral scanner, and CBCT (0.075 mm voxel size). CBCT-generated DICOM data were converted to STL format with dedicated software. All scan data were transferred to CAD software, and a total of 33 restorations were designed. Feldspathic ceramic blocks were used for milling. Micro-CT was employed to measure marginal and internal gaps, with 60 measurement points taken from three cross-sections per sample. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Bonferroni tests (p < 0.05). Results: CBCT exhibited greater marginal and internal gap dimensions (mean: 169.27 ± 38.64 μm), which were approximately 60–70 μm higher than those of the intraoral (97.00 ± 10.1 μm) and model scanner groups (109.67 ± 9.72 μm), exceeding clinically acceptable limits (≤120 μm) (p < 0.05). Intraoral and model scanners showed similar, clinically acceptable results. Conclusions: CBCT was less accurate for inlay restorations, likely due to their complex geometry. Nevertheless, fabrication was possible, and further research may improve its clinical applicability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15094626
Citations
3
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Ceramic Inlay Restorations Fabricated Through Model Scanner, Intraoral Scanner, and CBCT Scans

Kaan Orhan, Bora Akat, Ayben Şentürk, Mert Ocak et al.
3 citations
Applied Sciences
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
7.04
article

Comparison of Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Ceramic Inlay Restorations Fabricated Through Model Scanner, Intraoral Scanner, and CBCT Scans

Kaan Orhan, Bora Akat, Ayben Şentürk, Mert Ocak, Mehmet Ali Kılıçarslan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Background and Objectives: CBCT images have been successfully used for CAD/CAM crown restorations; however, their use for ceramic inlay restorations remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM ceramic inlay restorations fabricated using intraoral scanner, model scanner, and CBCT data. Materials and Methods: Inlay preparations were performed on 11 mandibular molar typodont teeth. The teeth were scanned using an intraoral scanner, an extraoral scanner, and CBCT (0.075 mm voxel size). CBCT-generated DICOM data were converted to STL format with dedicated software. All scan data were transferred to CAD software, and a total of 33 restorations were designed. Feldspathic ceramic blocks were used for milling. Micro-CT was employed to measure marginal and internal gaps, with 60 measurement points taken from three cross-sections per sample. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Bonferroni tests (p < 0.05). Results: CBCT exhibited greater marginal and internal gap dimensions (mean: 169.27 ± 38.64 μm), which were approximately 60–70 μm higher than those of the intraoral (97.00 ± 10.1 μm) and model scanner groups (109.67 ± 9.72 μm), exceeding clinically acceptable limits (≤120 μm) (p < 0.05). Intraoral and model scanners showed similar, clinically acceptable results. Conclusions: CBCT was less accurate for inlay restorations, likely due to their complex geometry. Nevertheless, fabrication was possible, and further research may improve its clinical applicability.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(9)
Ankara University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
7.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Ceramic Inlay Restorations Fabricated Through Model Scanner, Intraoral Scanner, and CBCT Scans — Kaan Orhan, Bora Akat, et al. · Applied Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS