Machine Learning in Predicting Cardiac Events for ESRD Patients: A Framework for Clinical Decision Support

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at an increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), highlighting the need for accurate risk prediction and personalized interventions. This study aims to develop and evaluate machine learning (ML) models to identify key predictive features and enhance clinical decision-making in MACE risk assessment. <b>Methods:</b> A dataset comprising 84 variables, including patient demographics, laboratory findings, and comorbidities, was analyzed using CatBoost, XGBoost, and LightGBM. Feature selection, cross-validation, and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analyses were employed to improve model interpretability and clinical relevance. <b>Results:</b> CatBoost exhibited the highest predictive performance among the models tested, achieving an AUC of 0.745 (0.605-0.83) with balanced sensitivity and specificity. Key predictors of MACEs included antiplatelet use, the grade of left ventricular hypertrophy, and serum albumin levels. SHAP analysis enhanced the interpretability of model outputs, supporting clinician-led risk stratification. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study highlights the potential of ML-based predictive modeling to improve MACE risk assessment in patients with ESRD. The findings support the adoption of ML models in clinical workflows by integrating explainable AI methods to enable individualized treatment planning. Future integration with electronic health record systems may facilitate real-time decision-making and enhance patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15091063
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning in Predicting Cardiac Events for ESRD Patients: A Framework for Clinical Decision Support

Ben‐Chang Shia, Chao‐Hsin Wu, Mingchih Chen, Chien-Wei Chuang et al.
3 citations
Diagnostics
Machine Learning in Healthcare
7.44
article

Machine Learning in Predicting Cardiac Events for ESRD Patients: A Framework for Clinical Decision Support

Ben‐Chang Shia, Chao‐Hsin Wu, Mingchih Chen, Chien-Wei Chuang, Chung‐Kuan Wu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at an increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), highlighting the need for accurate risk prediction and personalized interventions. This study aims to develop and evaluate machine learning (ML) models to identify key predictive features and enhance clinical decision-making in MACE risk assessment. <b>Methods:</b> A dataset comprising 84 variables, including patient demographics, laboratory findings, and comorbidities, was analyzed using CatBoost, XGBoost, and LightGBM. Feature selection, cross-validation, and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analyses were employed to improve model interpretability and clinical relevance. <b>Results:</b> CatBoost exhibited the highest predictive performance among the models tested, achieving an AUC of 0.745 (0.605-0.83) with balanced sensitivity and specificity. Key predictors of MACEs included antiplatelet use, the grade of left ventricular hypertrophy, and serum albumin levels. SHAP analysis enhanced the interpretability of model outputs, supporting clinician-led risk stratification. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study highlights the potential of ML-based predictive modeling to improve MACE risk assessment in patients with ESRD. The findings support the adoption of ML models in clinical workflows by integrating explainable AI methods to enable individualized treatment planning. Future integration with electronic health record systems may facilitate real-time decision-making and enhance patient outcomes.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(9)
Fu Jen Catholic University (TW)
Fu Jen Catholic University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.