Dexmedetomidine Continuous Infusion vs. Remifentanil Target-Controlled Infusion for Conscious Sedation in Otosclerosis Surgery—A Prospective, Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Otosclerosis causes progressive hearing loss through abnormal bone remodeling within the otic capsule and predominantly affects young individuals. Surgical intervention can markedly enhance a patient's quality of life and socio-economic status. Anesthetic management may involve either general anesthesia or monitored anesthesia care, with the latter enabling real-time assessment of hearing improvement while providing optimal surgical conditions and patient satisfaction. This study examines the efficacy and safety of continuous dexmedetomidine infusion and target-controlled remifentanil infusion for conscious sedation combined with local anesthesia in otosclerosis surgery. <b>Methods:</b> Seventy-four adult patients undergoing otosclerosis surgery were randomly assigned to either the dexmedetomidine group or the remifentanil group. Primary outcomes included patient satisfaction at 24 h post-surgery and surgeon satisfaction with operative conditions. Secondary outcomes comprised hemodynamic effects, the necessity for adjuncts to the proposed sedation protocols, and intra- and postoperative complications. <b>Results:</b> There was no statistically significant difference between the dexmedetomidine and remifentanil groups regarding patient satisfaction (<i>p</i> = 0.943) and surgeon satisfaction (<i>p</i> = 0.069). A strong correlation was observed between surgeons' assessments and patients' satisfaction Composite Scores (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.185, <i>p</i> = 0.003). Dexmedetomidine was more effective in significantly reducing arterial pressure and heart rate without undesirable clinical effects. <b>Conclusions</b>: No significant difference was found between the groups concerning patient and surgeon satisfaction. Dexmedetomidine infusion led to considerable reductions in arterial pressure and heart rate compared to remifentanil.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14092869
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dexmedetomidine Continuous Infusion vs. Remifentanil Target-Controlled Infusion for Conscious Sedation in Otosclerosis Surgery—A Prospective, Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial

Răzvan Alexandru Ciocan, Caius Breazu, Ioan Florin Marchis, Florin Vasile Mihăileanu et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

Dexmedetomidine Continuous Infusion vs. Remifentanil Target-Controlled Infusion for Conscious Sedation in Otosclerosis Surgery—A Prospective, Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial

Răzvan Alexandru Ciocan, Caius Breazu, Ioan Florin Marchis, Florin Vasile Mihăileanu, Alma Maniu, Violeta Necula, Matei Florin Negruț
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Otosclerosis causes progressive hearing loss through abnormal bone remodeling within the otic capsule and predominantly affects young individuals. Surgical intervention can markedly enhance a patient's quality of life and socio-economic status. Anesthetic management may involve either general anesthesia or monitored anesthesia care, with the latter enabling real-time assessment of hearing improvement while providing optimal surgical conditions and patient satisfaction. This study examines the efficacy and safety of continuous dexmedetomidine infusion and target-controlled remifentanil infusion for conscious sedation combined with local anesthesia in otosclerosis surgery. <b>Methods:</b> Seventy-four adult patients undergoing otosclerosis surgery were randomly assigned to either the dexmedetomidine group or the remifentanil group. Primary outcomes included patient satisfaction at 24 h post-surgery and surgeon satisfaction with operative conditions. Secondary outcomes comprised hemodynamic effects, the necessity for adjuncts to the proposed sedation protocols, and intra- and postoperative complications. <b>Results:</b> There was no statistically significant difference between the dexmedetomidine and remifentanil groups regarding patient satisfaction (<i>p</i> = 0.943) and surgeon satisfaction (<i>p</i> = 0.069). A strong correlation was observed between surgeons' assessments and patients' satisfaction Composite Scores (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.185, <i>p</i> = 0.003). Dexmedetomidine was more effective in significantly reducing arterial pressure and heart rate without undesirable clinical effects. <b>Conclusions</b>: No significant difference was found between the groups concerning patient and surgeon satisfaction. Dexmedetomidine infusion led to considerable reductions in arterial pressure and heart rate compared to remifentanil.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(9)
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Research Institute for Analytical Instrumentation (RO), Spitalul Clinic Județean de Urgență Cluj-Napoca (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.