Classification of Intraoral Photographs with Deep Learning Algorithms Trained According to Cephalometric Measurements

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Clinical intraoral photographs are important for orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, and documentation. This study aimed to evaluate deep learning algorithms trained utilizing actual cephalometric measurements for the classification of intraoral clinical photographs. <b>Methods</b>: This study was executed on lateral cephalograms and intraoral right-side images of 990 patients. IMPA, interincisal angle, U1-palatal plane angle, and Wits appraisal values were measured utilizing WebCeph. Intraoral photographs were divided into three groups based on cephalometric measurements. A total of 14 deep learning models (DenseNet 121, DenseNet 169, DenseNet 201, EfficientNet B0, EfficientNet V2, Inception V3, MobileNet V2, NasNetMobile, ResNet101, ResNet152, ResNet50, VGG16, VGG19, and Xception) were employed to classify the intraoral photographs. Performance metrics (F1 scores, accuracy, precision, and recall) were calculated and confusion matrices were formed. <b>Results</b>: The highest accuracy rates were 98.33% for IMPA groups, 99.00% for interincisal angle groups, 96.67% for U1-palatal plane angle groups, and 98.33% for Wits measurement groups. Lowest accuracy rates were 59% for IMPA groups, 53% for interincisal angle groups, 33.33% for U1-palatal plane angle groups, and 83.67% for Wits measurement groups. <b>Conclusions</b>: Although accuracy rates varied among classifications and DL algorithms, successful classification could be achieved in the majority of cases. Our results may be promising for case classification and analysis without the need for lateral cephalometric radiographs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15091059
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classification of Intraoral Photographs with Deep Learning Algorithms Trained According to Cephalometric Measurements

Mehmet Birol Özel, Muhammet Çakmak, Alper Sinanoğlu, Sultan Büşra Ay Kartbak et al.
14 citations
Diagnostics
Dental Radiography and Imaging
25.07
article

Classification of Intraoral Photographs with Deep Learning Algorithms Trained According to Cephalometric Measurements

Mehmet Birol Özel, Muhammet Çakmak, Alper Sinanoğlu, Sultan Büşra Ay Kartbak, Duygu Nur Cesur Kocakaya
article en
14 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Clinical intraoral photographs are important for orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, and documentation. This study aimed to evaluate deep learning algorithms trained utilizing actual cephalometric measurements for the classification of intraoral clinical photographs. <b>Methods</b>: This study was executed on lateral cephalograms and intraoral right-side images of 990 patients. IMPA, interincisal angle, U1-palatal plane angle, and Wits appraisal values were measured utilizing WebCeph. Intraoral photographs were divided into three groups based on cephalometric measurements. A total of 14 deep learning models (DenseNet 121, DenseNet 169, DenseNet 201, EfficientNet B0, EfficientNet V2, Inception V3, MobileNet V2, NasNetMobile, ResNet101, ResNet152, ResNet50, VGG16, VGG19, and Xception) were employed to classify the intraoral photographs. Performance metrics (F1 scores, accuracy, precision, and recall) were calculated and confusion matrices were formed. <b>Results</b>: The highest accuracy rates were 98.33% for IMPA groups, 99.00% for interincisal angle groups, 96.67% for U1-palatal plane angle groups, and 98.33% for Wits measurement groups. Lowest accuracy rates were 59% for IMPA groups, 53% for interincisal angle groups, 33.33% for U1-palatal plane angle groups, and 83.67% for Wits measurement groups. <b>Conclusions</b>: Although accuracy rates varied among classifications and DL algorithms, successful classification could be achieved in the majority of cases. Our results may be promising for case classification and analysis without the need for lateral cephalometric radiographs.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(9)
Kocaeli Üniversitesi (TR), Sinop University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
25.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.