Relevance of grain number and grain weight on barley yield responses to environmental and genetic factors

Global food demand is projected to rise, making it essential to enhance agricultural production to ensure food security while minimizing environmental impacts, particularly in the face of climate change challenges. Understanding the determination of grain yield (GY) in barley is crucial for future advancements in this crop. This study examines the relationships between the two major components of GY (grain number-GN and grain weight-GW), when driven by genetic and environmental factors. We compiled data of GY and its numerical components (i.e. GN and GW) to generate a large and unbiased database from every single paper having the word “barley” in the title published over 25 years in four prestigious international journals: Field Crop Research, European Journal of Agronomy, Crop Science and Crop and Pasture Science (formerly Australian Journal of Agricultural Research) between January 1996 and December 2021, both inclusive. GN was significantly better correlated with GY than GW, accounting for 86 % of the variation in GY compared to just 13 % for GW. The changes in GY responsiveness to environmental and genetic factors were mainly due to variations in GN, especially in scenarios with high responsiveness. In contrast, low-responsiveness cases showed trade-offs between GN and GW, suggesting compensatory mechanisms that may not accurately reflect competition for resources. The potential to increase barley GY relies heavily on GN, emphasizing the need to optimise conditions during the critical period of GN determination. Barley crops under typical field conditions are generally not limited by resource availability during grain filling. • We quantified barley grain yield numerical components depending on genetic and/or environmental source of variation. • Grain number was the main component regardless of the source of variation, especially in scenarios with high responsiveness. • In low-responsiveness scenarios, there was a trade-off between grain number and grain weight. • Barley crops under typical field conditions are generally not limited by resource availability during grain filling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Field Crops Research
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109922
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relevance of grain number and grain weight on barley yield responses to environmental and genetic factors

Román A. Serrago, Gustavo A. Slafer, Guillermo A. García, Roxana Savin et al.
4 citations
Field Crops Research
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
7.61
article

Relevance of grain number and grain weight on barley yield responses to environmental and genetic factors

Román A. Serrago, Gustavo A. Slafer, Guillermo A. García, Roxana Savin, Daniel J. Miralles
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Global food demand is projected to rise, making it essential to enhance agricultural production to ensure food security while minimizing environmental impacts, particularly in the face of climate change challenges. Understanding the determination of grain yield (GY) in barley is crucial for future advancements in this crop. This study examines the relationships between the two major components of GY (grain number-GN and grain weight-GW), when driven by genetic and environmental factors. We compiled data of GY and its numerical components (i.e. GN and GW) to generate a large and unbiased database from every single paper having the word “barley” in the title published over 25 years in four prestigious international journals: Field Crop Research, European Journal of Agronomy, Crop Science and Crop and Pasture Science (formerly Australian Journal of Agricultural Research) between January 1996 and December 2021, both inclusive. GN was significantly better correlated with GY than GW, accounting for 86 % of the variation in GY compared to just 13 % for GW. The changes in GY responsiveness to environmental and genetic factors were mainly due to variations in GN, especially in scenarios with high responsiveness. In contrast, low-responsiveness cases showed trade-offs between GN and GW, suggesting compensatory mechanisms that may not accurately reflect competition for resources. The potential to increase barley GY relies heavily on GN, emphasizing the need to optimise conditions during the critical period of GN determination. Barley crops under typical field conditions are generally not limited by resource availability during grain filling. • We quantified barley grain yield numerical components depending on genetic and/or environmental source of variation. • Grain number was the main component regardless of the source of variation, especially in scenarios with high responsiveness. • In low-responsiveness scenarios, there was a trade-off between grain number and grain weight. • Barley crops under typical field conditions are generally not limited by resource availability during grain filling.

Field Crops ResearchVol. 328
Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), Universitat de Lleida (ES), Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR), Agricultural Plant Physiology and Ecology Research Institute (AR), AGRIDEA (CH)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
7.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.