Luminosity function of Type II GRBs – differences from long GRBs

ABSTRACT Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are generally categorized into long and short bursts based on their duration ($T_{90}$). Recently, it has been proposed that GRBs can also be classified into Type I (merger) and Type II (collapsar) bursts based on the different origin. From a sample of Swift long GRBs (LGRBs) with a redshift completeness of 60 per cent and $P \ge 2.6 \, \text{ph} \, \text{cm}^{-2} \, \text{s}^{-1}$, collected through the end of 2023, we identify a pure sample of 146 Type II GRBs. With this sample, we construct the luminosity function (LF) using both the broken power law (BPL) and triple power law (TPL) models. Our results indicate that, similar to LGRBs, a strong redshift evolution in either luminosity or density is necessary to accurately account for the observations, regardless of the specific form of the LF assumed. The LF of LGRBs remains a topic of debate, with some studies suggesting it follows a BPL form, while others advocate for a TPL form. In our study, we find that the LF of Type II GRBs tends to favour a BPL model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slaf037
Primary Topic
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Luminosity function of Type II GRBs – differences from long GRBs

Shuang-Xi Yi, Yan-Kun Qu, Yupeng Yang, Zhongyi Man et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
article

Luminosity function of Type II GRBs – differences from long GRBs

Shuang-Xi Yi, Yan-Kun Qu, Yupeng Yang, Zhongyi Man, F. Y. Wang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are generally categorized into long and short bursts based on their duration ($T_{90}$). Recently, it has been proposed that GRBs can also be classified into Type I (merger) and Type II (collapsar) bursts based on the different origin. From a sample of Swift long GRBs (LGRBs) with a redshift completeness of 60 per cent and $P \ge 2.6 \, \text{ph} \, \text{cm}^{-2} \, \text{s}^{-1}$, collected through the end of 2023, we identify a pure sample of 146 Type II GRBs. With this sample, we construct the luminosity function (LF) using both the broken power law (BPL) and triple power law (TPL) models. Our results indicate that, similar to LGRBs, a strong redshift evolution in either luminosity or density is necessary to accurately account for the observations, regardless of the specific form of the LF assumed. The LF of LGRBs remains a topic of debate, with some studies suggesting it follows a BPL form, while others advocate for a TPL form. In our study, we find that the LF of Type II GRBs tends to favour a BPL model.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society LettersVol. 540(1)
Qufu Normal University (CN), Astronomy and Space (AU), Nanjing University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Luminosity function of Type II GRBs – differences from long GRBs — Shuang-Xi Yi, Yan-Kun Qu, et al. · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS