Reinforcement-Learning Based Covert Social Influence Operations

How might reinforcement-learning based covert social influence operations (CSIOs) be run, given that the CSIO agent wants to maximize influence and minimize discoverability of malicious accounts? And how successful can they be, given that both social platform bot detectors and humans might report them to the social platform? To answer these questions, we propose RL_CSIO, a methodology based on reinforcement learning (RL) for running CSIOs. We ran 4 CSIOs with IRB-approval over a period of 5 days using a panel of 225 human subjects. We explore 8 research questions based on the data collected. The results show that RL_CSIO agents successfully trade off influence and discoverability - but in ways that are nuanced and unexpected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3696410.3714729
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reinforcement-Learning Based Covert Social Influence Operations

Saurabh Kumar, Jiazhi Zhang, Valerio La Gatta, V. S. Subrahmanian et al.
2 citations
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
6.49
article

Reinforcement-Learning Based Covert Social Influence Operations

Saurabh Kumar, Jiazhi Zhang, Valerio La Gatta, V. S. Subrahmanian, Andrew Pulver, Andrea Pugliese, Youzhi Zhang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

How might reinforcement-learning based covert social influence operations (CSIOs) be run, given that the CSIO agent wants to maximize influence and minimize discoverability of malicious accounts? And how successful can they be, given that both social platform bot detectors and humans might report them to the social platform? To answer these questions, we propose RL_CSIO, a methodology based on reinforcement learning (RL) for running CSIOs. We ran 4 CSIOs with IRB-approval over a period of 5 days using a panel of 225 human subjects. We explore 8 research questions based on the data collected. The results show that RL_CSIO agents successfully trade off influence and discoverability - but in ways that are nuanced and unexpected.

Northwestern University (US), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), University of Calabria (IT), Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad (IN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.