Coreness Maximization through Budget-Limited Edge Insertion

The Budget Limited Coreness Maximization (BLCM) problem aims to enhance average user engagement by activating a limited number of connections, i.e., inserting up to b edges to maximize the coreness gain of all vertices in a graph. Due to the cascading feature, we prove the BLCM is NP-hard, APX-hard, and not submodular, meaning greedy sequential edge insertion fails to deliver satisfactory results. As a result, solving BLCM requires combinatorial edge insertion and must face the combinatorial exploration difficulty. This paper proposes the first effective and polynomial-time approach to BLCM. It embeds local combinatorial optimization into global greedy search to boost the benefits of combinatorial optimization while restricting its complexity. Specifically, we propose efficient methods to evaluate the cascaded coreness improvements of two local combinatorial strategies, i.e., when a leader or a group of nodes increase their coreness values via local edge insertion. Note that the key difficulty lies in evaluating the cascading effects. Based on these, we propose three efficient combinatorial edge insertion strategies: (1) Leader-Centric Greedy Insertion (LCGI), (2) Group-Centric Greedy Insertion (GCGI), and (3) a Leader-Group Balance (LGB) insertion. LCGI greedily finds the most influential leader that can produce the highest coreness gain together with its followers. GCGI finds the most influential group that can promote the most coreness gain. LGB combines the two strategies to select edge combinations adaptively. We prove the low complexity of LCGI, GCGI and LGB. Experiments conducted on 13 real-world datasets highlight their practical utility and superiority over existing approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3696410.3714838
Primary Topic
Graph Theory and Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coreness Maximization through Budget-Limited Edge Insertion

Xiaowei Lv, Xiaojia Xu, Yongcai Wang, Haoyu Liu et al.
Graph Theory and Algorithms
article

Coreness Maximization through Budget-Limited Edge Insertion

Xiaowei Lv, Xiaojia Xu, Yongcai Wang, Haoyu Liu, Deying Li
article en

Abstract

The Budget Limited Coreness Maximization (BLCM) problem aims to enhance average user engagement by activating a limited number of connections, i.e., inserting up to b edges to maximize the coreness gain of all vertices in a graph. Due to the cascading feature, we prove the BLCM is NP-hard, APX-hard, and not submodular, meaning greedy sequential edge insertion fails to deliver satisfactory results. As a result, solving BLCM requires combinatorial edge insertion and must face the combinatorial exploration difficulty. This paper proposes the first effective and polynomial-time approach to BLCM. It embeds local combinatorial optimization into global greedy search to boost the benefits of combinatorial optimization while restricting its complexity. Specifically, we propose efficient methods to evaluate the cascaded coreness improvements of two local combinatorial strategies, i.e., when a leader or a group of nodes increase their coreness values via local edge insertion. Note that the key difficulty lies in evaluating the cascading effects. Based on these, we propose three efficient combinatorial edge insertion strategies: (1) Leader-Centric Greedy Insertion (LCGI), (2) Group-Centric Greedy Insertion (GCGI), and (3) a Leader-Group Balance (LGB) insertion. LCGI greedily finds the most influential leader that can produce the highest coreness gain together with its followers. GCGI finds the most influential group that can promote the most coreness gain. LGB combines the two strategies to select edge combinations adaptively. We prove the low complexity of LCGI, GCGI and LGB. Experiments conducted on 13 real-world datasets highlight their practical utility and superiority over existing approaches.

Renmin University of China (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Renmin University of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Graph Theory and Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.