Distinctiveness Maximization in Datasets Assemblage

In this paper, given a user's query set and budget, we aim to use the limited budget to help users assemble a set of datasets that can enrich a base dataset by introducing the maximum number of distinct tuples (i.e., maximizing distinctiveness). We prove this problem to be NP-hard. A greedy algorithm using exact distinctiveness computation attains an approximation ratio of (1-e-1 )/2, but it lacks efficiency and scalability due to its frequent computation of the exact distinctiveness marginal gain of any candidate dataset for selection. This requires scanning through every tuple in candidate datasets and thus is unaffordable in practice. To overcome this limitation, we propose an efficient machine learning (ML)-based method for estimating the distinctiveness marginal gain of any candidate dataset. This effectively eliminates the need to test each tuple individually. Estimating the distinctiveness marginal gain of a dataset involves estimating the number of distinct tuples in the tuple sets returned by each query in a query set across multiple datasets. This can be viewed as the cardinality estimation for a query set on a set of datasets, and the proposed method is the first to tackle this cardinality estimation problem. This is a significant advancement over prior methods that were limited to single-query cardinality estimation on a single dataset and struggled with identifying overlaps among tuple sets returned by each query in a query set across multiple datasets. Extensive experiments using five real-world data pools demonstrate that our algorithm, which utilizes ML-based distinctiveness estimation, outperforms all relevant baselines in effectiveness, efficiency, and scalability. A case study on two downstream ML tasks also highlights its potential to find datasets with more useful tuples to enhance the performance of ML tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3696410.3714830
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Data Stream Mining Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinctiveness Maximization in Datasets Assemblage

Volkan Dedeoglu, Shixun Huang, Reza Arablouei, J. Shane Culpepper et al.
1 citations
Data Stream Mining Techniques
2.48
article

Distinctiveness Maximization in Datasets Assemblage

Volkan Dedeoglu, Shixun Huang, Reza Arablouei, J. Shane Culpepper, Zhifeng Bao, Tingting Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this paper, given a user's query set and budget, we aim to use the limited budget to help users assemble a set of datasets that can enrich a base dataset by introducing the maximum number of distinct tuples (i.e., maximizing distinctiveness). We prove this problem to be NP-hard. A greedy algorithm using exact distinctiveness computation attains an approximation ratio of (1-e-1 )/2, but it lacks efficiency and scalability due to its frequent computation of the exact distinctiveness marginal gain of any candidate dataset for selection. This requires scanning through every tuple in candidate datasets and thus is unaffordable in practice. To overcome this limitation, we propose an efficient machine learning (ML)-based method for estimating the distinctiveness marginal gain of any candidate dataset. This effectively eliminates the need to test each tuple individually. Estimating the distinctiveness marginal gain of a dataset involves estimating the number of distinct tuples in the tuple sets returned by each query in a query set across multiple datasets. This can be viewed as the cardinality estimation for a query set on a set of datasets, and the proposed method is the first to tackle this cardinality estimation problem. This is a significant advancement over prior methods that were limited to single-query cardinality estimation on a single dataset and struggled with identifying overlaps among tuple sets returned by each query in a query set across multiple datasets. Extensive experiments using five real-world data pools demonstrate that our algorithm, which utilizes ML-based distinctiveness estimation, outperforms all relevant baselines in effectiveness, efficiency, and scalability. A case study on two downstream ML tasks also highlights its potential to find datasets with more useful tuples to enhance the performance of ML tasks.

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Wollongong (AU), Data61 (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Data Stream Mining Techniques
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.