Baroreflex Sensitivity and Hemodynamic Parameters at Rest and in Response to Physical and Mental Stress: A Comparative Study of Patients Undergoing Different Dialysis Modalities

Introduction Cardiac arrhythmias are the leading mortal cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and autonomic dysfunction plays a predominant role. This is the first study to compare baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and hemodynamic responses at rest and after mental and physical stimulation maneuvers between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Methods A total of 68 ESKD patients (34 HD and 34 PD, matched for age, sex, and dialysis vintage) were included. Continuous recordings from Finometer-PRO at rest and during mental arithmetic, orthostatic, and handgrip exercise tests were used for the calculation of BRS and hemodynamic responses in each individual. Results The two groups were similar in terms of age, sex, dialysis vintage, and major comorbidities. BRS during mental (HD: 3.59±2.62 vs. PD: 5.50±9.40 ms/mmHg, p=0.280) and physical stress tests (orthostatic: HD: 3.23±2.42 vs. PD: 2.07±2.69 ms/mmHg, p=0.777) was similar between HD and PD patients. During the mental test, both groups presented increases in systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels compared to rest (SBP HD: 156.3±27.7 vs. 142.7±20.0 mmHg, p<0.05; PD: 158.0±25.6 vs. 143.1±23.6 mmHg, p<0.05), but without significant between-group differences (p=0.853/p=0.611). Similarly, no significant between-group differences were noted in the other hemodynamic parameters. Mean SBP levels during the orthostatic test were significantly decreased compared to rest in both groups (HD: 135.4±26.8 vs. 142.2 ±20.1 mmHg; p<0.05; PD 135.3±21.9 vs. 143.1±23.6 mmHg; p<0.05), but the overall response was not different between groups (p=0.937). Finally, the hemodynamic responses during handgrip exercise and recovery did not differ between HD and PD. Conclusions BRS and hemodynamic responses to mental and physical stress tests were similar between HD and PD patients, suggesting that the function of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) in ESKD is not affected by dialysis modality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.82804
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Baroreflex Sensitivity and Hemodynamic Parameters at Rest and in Response to Physical and Mental Stress: A Comparative Study of Patients Undergoing Different Dialysis Modalities

Κωνσταντίνα Δίπλα, Artemios Karagiannidis, Pantelis Sarafidis, Chrysostomos Dimitriadis et al.
Cureus
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
article

Baroreflex Sensitivity and Hemodynamic Parameters at Rest and in Response to Physical and Mental Stress: A Comparative Study of Patients Undergoing Different Dialysis Modalities

Κωνσταντίνα Δίπλα, Artemios Karagiannidis, Pantelis Sarafidis, Chrysostomos Dimitriadis, Aggelos Koutlas, Marieta P. Theodorakopoulou, Andreas Zafeiridis, Ioannis Tsouchnikas, Danai Faitatzidou, Fotini Iatridi
article en

Abstract

Introduction Cardiac arrhythmias are the leading mortal cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and autonomic dysfunction plays a predominant role. This is the first study to compare baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and hemodynamic responses at rest and after mental and physical stimulation maneuvers between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Methods A total of 68 ESKD patients (34 HD and 34 PD, matched for age, sex, and dialysis vintage) were included. Continuous recordings from Finometer-PRO at rest and during mental arithmetic, orthostatic, and handgrip exercise tests were used for the calculation of BRS and hemodynamic responses in each individual. Results The two groups were similar in terms of age, sex, dialysis vintage, and major comorbidities. BRS during mental (HD: 3.59±2.62 vs. PD: 5.50±9.40 ms/mmHg, p=0.280) and physical stress tests (orthostatic: HD: 3.23±2.42 vs. PD: 2.07±2.69 ms/mmHg, p=0.777) was similar between HD and PD patients. During the mental test, both groups presented increases in systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels compared to rest (SBP HD: 156.3±27.7 vs. 142.7±20.0 mmHg, p<0.05; PD: 158.0±25.6 vs. 143.1±23.6 mmHg, p<0.05), but without significant between-group differences (p=0.853/p=0.611). Similarly, no significant between-group differences were noted in the other hemodynamic parameters. Mean SBP levels during the orthostatic test were significantly decreased compared to rest in both groups (HD: 135.4±26.8 vs. 142.2 ±20.1 mmHg; p<0.05; PD 135.3±21.9 vs. 143.1±23.6 mmHg; p<0.05), but the overall response was not different between groups (p=0.937). Finally, the hemodynamic responses during handgrip exercise and recovery did not differ between HD and PD. Conclusions BRS and hemodynamic responses to mental and physical stress tests were similar between HD and PD patients, suggesting that the function of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) in ESKD is not affected by dialysis modality.

CureusVol. 17(4)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), Ippokrateio General Hospital of Thessaloniki (GR)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.