The Czech version of the back pain attitudes questionnaire: Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties analysis

BackgroundAssessing attitudes and beliefs regarding low back pain is an integral component of a person-centered biopsychosocial approach to care.ObjectivesThis study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire (Back-PAQ) and to evaluate the psychometric properties of both the full 34-item version and its shortened versions.MethodsFollowing recommended guidelines, cross-cultural adaptation process included forward and back translation, expert committee review, and pretesting using Three-Step Test-Interview. The psychometric properties evaluation involved physiotherapists and members of the general public, both with and without low back pain. Factor structure was analyzed using Principal Component Analysis, internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's α, and test-retest reliability was measured using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).ResultsThe Back-PAQ was translated and culturally adapted to Czech (Back-PAQ-CZ). Five hundred and thirty-nine participants (299 physiotherapists; 240 members of general public) were included for the analysis. No meaningful factor structure was found for the 34-item Back-PAQ-CZ. However, a meaningful factor structure and acceptable Internal Consistency were found for the 10-item and 8-item versions. The test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC<sub>2,1 </sub>= 0.94), good (ICC<sub>2,1 </sub>= 0.87) and moderate to good (ICC<sub>2,1 </sub>= 0.76) for the 34-, 10- and 8-item version, respectively.ConclusionsThe Back-PAQ-CZ and its shortened versions should only be used with an awareness of identified limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251336219
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Czech version of the back pain attitudes questionnaire: Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties analysis

Tomas Kavka, Zuzana Blahova, Ben J.S. Darlow, Tomas Nedoma
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

The Czech version of the back pain attitudes questionnaire: Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties analysis

Tomas Kavka, Zuzana Blahova, Ben J.S. Darlow, Tomas Nedoma
article en

Abstract

BackgroundAssessing attitudes and beliefs regarding low back pain is an integral component of a person-centered biopsychosocial approach to care.ObjectivesThis study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire (Back-PAQ) and to evaluate the psychometric properties of both the full 34-item version and its shortened versions.MethodsFollowing recommended guidelines, cross-cultural adaptation process included forward and back translation, expert committee review, and pretesting using Three-Step Test-Interview. The psychometric properties evaluation involved physiotherapists and members of the general public, both with and without low back pain. Factor structure was analyzed using Principal Component Analysis, internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's α, and test-retest reliability was measured using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).ResultsThe Back-PAQ was translated and culturally adapted to Czech (Back-PAQ-CZ). Five hundred and thirty-nine participants (299 physiotherapists; 240 members of general public) were included for the analysis. No meaningful factor structure was found for the 34-item Back-PAQ-CZ. However, a meaningful factor structure and acceptable Internal Consistency were found for the 10-item and 8-item versions. The test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC<sub>2,1 </sub>= 0.94), good (ICC<sub>2,1 </sub>= 0.87) and moderate to good (ICC<sub>2,1 </sub>= 0.76) for the 34-, 10- and 8-item version, respectively.ConclusionsThe Back-PAQ-CZ and its shortened versions should only be used with an awareness of identified limitations.

Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal RehabilitationVol. 38(6)
Charles University (CZ), University Hospital in Motol (CZ), Trencianska Univerzita Alexandra Dubceka V Trencine (SK), University of Otago (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.