Conjugacy classes of derangements in finite groups of Lie type

Let <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> be a finite almost simple group of Lie type acting faithfully and primitively on a set <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="normal upper Omega"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\Omega</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>. We prove an analogue of the Boston–Shalev conjecture for conjugacy classes: the proportion of conjugacy classes of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> consisting of derangements is bounded away from zero. This answers a question of Guralnick and Zalesski. The proof is based on results on the anatomy of palindromic polynomials over finite fields (with either reflective symmetry or conjugate-reflective symmetry).