Exploring the challenges of pushing the resolution of DUV immersion lithography

With the advent of ArF immersion lithography, printing gratings down to size of 38nm became possible using dipole illumination settings. Further reduction towards a k1 of 0.25 results in a very small pupil pole size which brings increased imaging complexity. Effects to consider include decrease in contrast, optics lifetime impact and increased impact of lens aberrations and heating. Next to that, metrology markers, with a significantly larger pitch compared to the product feature, have a different imaging response to these extreme pupil settings adding to the complexity. In this work, using a combination of scanner exposures as well as simulations, we demonstrate these challenges in detail. Furthermore, we propose how these effects can be mitigated by modifying the illumination pupil using a new Source Mask Optimization (SMO) flow for an improved imaging, overlay and productivity performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3050042
Primary Topic
Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the challenges of pushing the resolution of DUV immersion lithography

Danielle Palmen, Stephen Hsu, Jan Baselmans, Gerben Hopman et al.
Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
article

Exploring the challenges of pushing the resolution of DUV immersion lithography

Danielle Palmen, Stephen Hsu, Jan Baselmans, Gerben Hopman, Maryam Ashouei, Marieke van Veen, Rene Queens, Derek Shi, Edwin D. de Jong, Remco Scheerder, Jette van den Broeke
article en

Abstract

With the advent of ArF immersion lithography, printing gratings down to size of 38nm became possible using dipole illumination settings. Further reduction towards a k1 of 0.25 results in a very small pupil pole size which brings increased imaging complexity. Effects to consider include decrease in contrast, optics lifetime impact and increased impact of lens aberrations and heating. Next to that, metrology markers, with a significantly larger pitch compared to the product feature, have a different imaging response to these extreme pupil settings adding to the complexity. In this work, using a combination of scanner exposures as well as simulations, we demonstrate these challenges in detail. Furthermore, we propose how these effects can be mitigated by modifying the illumination pupil using a new Source Mask Optimization (SMO) flow for an improved imaging, overlay and productivity performance.

ASML (United States) (US), ASML (Netherlands) (NL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring the challenges of pushing the resolution of DUV immersion lithography — Danielle Palmen, Stephen Hsu, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS