Metaatom choice considering process variation

Metalenses are flat lenses constructed from thin films using CMOS based manufacturing that operate using phase effects to manipulate light. Metalenses are used in visible and infrared wavelengths for applications ranging from infrared facial recognition for cell phones to telescopic imaging of astronomic objects. Metalenses are useful due to their thin form factor, a few microns thick, which reduces weight and volume for applications such as cell phones and AR/VR/MR headsets. Metalenses are designed with meta-atoms. Meta-atoms are subwavelength features that vary in size and sometimes pitch to manipulate the phase of an incident optical wavefront. Simple meta-atoms include square and circular XY plane shapes. Complex meta-atoms include XY plane shapes with many corners or features such as crosses or stars. Simply shaped meta-atoms tend to perform well for monochromatic lens purposes. However, when multiple operating wavelengths (achromatic designs) are desired, simple meta-atoms generally demonstrate poor performance for at least some of the desired wavelengths. Complex meta-atoms may improve achromatic performance but may be more susceptible to manufacturing variations. Understanding metalens performance response to allowed process variation ranges can aid meta-atom choice. This study will simulate several meta-atoms through manufacturing variations and compare their performance robustness. Process models will be used to vary process conditions such as etch time, photoresist thickness, or patterned material thickness. The study finds that complex meta-atoms demonstrate degraded performance compared to simple circular meta-atoms after simulated manufacturing.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3055032
Primary Topic
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metaatom choice considering process variation

Andrew M. C. Dawes, Maryvonne Chalony, Lawrence S. Melvin
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
article

Metaatom choice considering process variation

Andrew M. C. Dawes, Maryvonne Chalony, Lawrence S. Melvin
article en

Abstract

Metalenses are flat lenses constructed from thin films using CMOS based manufacturing that operate using phase effects to manipulate light. Metalenses are used in visible and infrared wavelengths for applications ranging from infrared facial recognition for cell phones to telescopic imaging of astronomic objects. Metalenses are useful due to their thin form factor, a few microns thick, which reduces weight and volume for applications such as cell phones and AR/VR/MR headsets. Metalenses are designed with meta-atoms. Meta-atoms are subwavelength features that vary in size and sometimes pitch to manipulate the phase of an incident optical wavefront. Simple meta-atoms include square and circular XY plane shapes. Complex meta-atoms include XY plane shapes with many corners or features such as crosses or stars. Simply shaped meta-atoms tend to perform well for monochromatic lens purposes. However, when multiple operating wavelengths (achromatic designs) are desired, simple meta-atoms generally demonstrate poor performance for at least some of the desired wavelengths. Complex meta-atoms may improve achromatic performance but may be more susceptible to manufacturing variations. Understanding metalens performance response to allowed process variation ranges can aid meta-atom choice. This study will simulate several meta-atoms through manufacturing variations and compare their performance robustness. Process models will be used to vary process conditions such as etch time, photoresist thickness, or patterned material thickness. The study finds that complex meta-atoms demonstrate degraded performance compared to simple circular meta-atoms after simulated manufacturing.

Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Metaatom choice considering process variation — Andrew M. C. Dawes, Maryvonne Chalony, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS