Racial Differences in Naturalistic Psychedelic Use — Motivations for Use, Communication with Health Care Providers, and Outcomes

People of Color have been under-included in psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT) research. Researchers have argued that systemic issues resulting in harms to communities of color like the War on Drugs and recurrent exposure to discrimination in healthcare settings may reduce their willingness to engage in PAT research. However, there are no empirical data regarding People of Color's trust or willingness in using psychedelics with support of trained healthcare providers. Therefore, we analyzed data from a large-scale survey of people using psychedelics to explore interactions between People of Color and healthcare providers in North America. The sample included 3,547 White people, 448 People of Color, and 377 Multiracial people. A lower proportion of People of Color consumed psychedelics with the support of a trained provider but an equal proportion had disclosed psychedelic use to primary care providers. Further, People of Color were equally motivated to use psychedelics with a trained healthcare provider, used psychedelics to treat similar issues, and similarly reported psychedelics as effective with other groups. Our findings suggest that lack of trust may not fully explain the underrepresentation of People of Color in PAT research, and future studies should investigate other barriers to People of Color's inclusion in PAT research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2025.2491381
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychedelics and Drug Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racial Differences in Naturalistic Psychedelic Use — Motivations for Use, Communication with Health Care Providers, and Outcomes

Daniel J. Kruger, Kevin F. Boehnke, Jacob S. Aday, Nicolas G. Glynos et al.
1 citations
Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
Psychedelics and Drug Studies
2.31
article

Racial Differences in Naturalistic Psychedelic Use — Motivations for Use, Communication with Health Care Providers, and Outcomes

Daniel J. Kruger, Kevin F. Boehnke, Jacob S. Aday, Nicolas G. Glynos, Stephanie Lake, Philippe Lucas, Mallet R. Reid
article en
1 citations

Abstract

People of Color have been under-included in psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT) research. Researchers have argued that systemic issues resulting in harms to communities of color like the War on Drugs and recurrent exposure to discrimination in healthcare settings may reduce their willingness to engage in PAT research. However, there are no empirical data regarding People of Color's trust or willingness in using psychedelics with support of trained healthcare providers. Therefore, we analyzed data from a large-scale survey of people using psychedelics to explore interactions between People of Color and healthcare providers in North America. The sample included 3,547 White people, 448 People of Color, and 377 Multiracial people. A lower proportion of People of Color consumed psychedelics with the support of a trained provider but an equal proportion had disclosed psychedelic use to primary care providers. Further, People of Color were equally motivated to use psychedelics with a trained healthcare provider, used psychedelics to treat similar issues, and similarly reported psychedelics as effective with other groups. Our findings suggest that lack of trust may not fully explain the underrepresentation of People of Color in PAT research, and future studies should investigate other barriers to People of Color's inclusion in PAT research.

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
University of Michigan (US), University of California System (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US), Michigan State University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Psychedelics and Drug Studies
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.