What we know about what they think: a systematic literature review of experts’ perspectives on agri-food biotechnology

Purpose Experts play a pivotal role in the adoption and regulation of agri-food biotechnology. This review aims to explore experts’ perspectives on agri-biotechnology and identify the key factors influencing their evaluations. Design/methodology/approach In this systematic review, we have performed a comprehensive search across four databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar and Google Custom Search. The screening process, documented using a PRISMA flow diagram, yielded 89 studies. Data from reviewed studies was analyzed using a multi-method approach. Findings The findings revealed that experts hold diverse and sometimes conflicting views on agri-biotechnology, indicating that the expert community is far from uniform. Their perspectives are significantly shaped by professional characteristics (e.g. discipline and affiliations). Additionally, other factors, such as perceived benefits and risks, also play a role. Originality/value As the first systematic review focusing specifically on experts’ perspectives on agri-biotechnology, this study provides a comprehensive overview of the current landscape in this research field. The integration of social identity theory and the adaptation of classic decision-making models within the context of biotechnology provide a novel theoretical framework, addressing a significant gap in the literature and paving the way for future research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
British Food Journal
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-07-2024-0679
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What we know about what they think: a systematic literature review of experts’ perspectives on agri-food biotechnology

Márcia Dutra de Barcellos, Hans De Steur, Yixuan Guo
1 citations
British Food Journal
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
1.75
article

What we know about what they think: a systematic literature review of experts’ perspectives on agri-food biotechnology

Márcia Dutra de Barcellos, Hans De Steur, Yixuan Guo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose Experts play a pivotal role in the adoption and regulation of agri-food biotechnology. This review aims to explore experts’ perspectives on agri-biotechnology and identify the key factors influencing their evaluations. Design/methodology/approach In this systematic review, we have performed a comprehensive search across four databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar and Google Custom Search. The screening process, documented using a PRISMA flow diagram, yielded 89 studies. Data from reviewed studies was analyzed using a multi-method approach. Findings The findings revealed that experts hold diverse and sometimes conflicting views on agri-biotechnology, indicating that the expert community is far from uniform. Their perspectives are significantly shaped by professional characteristics (e.g. discipline and affiliations). Additionally, other factors, such as perceived benefits and risks, also play a role. Originality/value As the first systematic review focusing specifically on experts’ perspectives on agri-biotechnology, this study provides a comprehensive overview of the current landscape in this research field. The integration of social identity theory and the adaptation of classic decision-making models within the context of biotechnology provide a novel theoretical framework, addressing a significant gap in the literature and paving the way for future research.

British Food JournalVol. 127(7)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.