Equivocal Justice: Migrant and Refugee Survivors of Family Violence and Interactions With the Australian Legal System

Little is known about how migrant and refugee women who experience family violence interact with the Australian justice system. Drawing on interviews with survivors and service providers and a focus group discussion (<i>n</i> = 73), this paper explores how survivors view and engage with Australian legal interventions. We found the legal system to be an unreliable site for migrant and refugee women; it was capable of both perpetuating violence through institutional discrimination and offering much-needed protection, at times simultaneously. Interactions were influenced by and influenced survivors' legal consciousness and informed their relationship with the resettlement state. The findings underscore the importance of legal responses premised upon listening to survivors' claims, respecting their agency, and accounting for the intersectional realities of their lives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Violence Against Women
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012251334767
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equivocal Justice: Migrant and Refugee Survivors of Family Violence and Interactions With the Australian Legal System

Cathy Vaughan, Claire F. Sullivan, Karen Block, Jeanine Hourani
Violence Against Women
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Equivocal Justice: Migrant and Refugee Survivors of Family Violence and Interactions With the Australian Legal System

Cathy Vaughan, Claire F. Sullivan, Karen Block, Jeanine Hourani
article en

Abstract

Little is known about how migrant and refugee women who experience family violence interact with the Australian justice system. Drawing on interviews with survivors and service providers and a focus group discussion (<i>n</i> = 73), this paper explores how survivors view and engage with Australian legal interventions. We found the legal system to be an unreliable site for migrant and refugee women; it was capable of both perpetuating violence through institutional discrimination and offering much-needed protection, at times simultaneously. Interactions were influenced by and influenced survivors' legal consciousness and informed their relationship with the resettlement state. The findings underscore the importance of legal responses premised upon listening to survivors' claims, respecting their agency, and accounting for the intersectional realities of their lives.

Violence Against WomenVol. 32(6-7)
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Australian Government, University of Melbourne, Riksbankens Jubileumsfond
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.