Analysis of Creative Thinking Ability and Learning Outcomes Through the Treffinger Learning Model

This study aims to describe creative thinking skills and learning outcomes through learning with the Treffinger model. The subjects of this study were Biology Education students who took the Animal Structure course in the odd semester of the 2024/2025 academic year, with a total of 24 students. Creative thinking data were collected using instruments with a Likert scale, while tests collected learning outcomes. The collected data were analyzed qualitatively into five categories. The results of the analysis of creative thinking skills showed students with the very good category as many as 11 people (46%) and the good category 13 people (54%). Students with a very good category had the most fluency indicator of 19 people, while those with the good category had the most elaboration indicator for 16 students. Learning outcomes are more in the good ranking of 16 people than the very good category (8 people). Through learning the Treffinger model, creative thinking ability, and learning outcomes of animal structure, students vary in the categories of good and very good.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JURNAL PIJAR MIPA
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v20i2.7942
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Creative Thinking Ability and Learning Outcomes Through the Treffinger Learning Model

Kusmiyati Kusmiyati, I Wayan Merta
JURNAL PIJAR MIPA
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
article

Analysis of Creative Thinking Ability and Learning Outcomes Through the Treffinger Learning Model

Kusmiyati Kusmiyati, I Wayan Merta
article en

Abstract

This study aims to describe creative thinking skills and learning outcomes through learning with the Treffinger model. The subjects of this study were Biology Education students who took the Animal Structure course in the odd semester of the 2024/2025 academic year, with a total of 24 students. Creative thinking data were collected using instruments with a Likert scale, while tests collected learning outcomes. The collected data were analyzed qualitatively into five categories. The results of the analysis of creative thinking skills showed students with the very good category as many as 11 people (46%) and the good category 13 people (54%). Students with a very good category had the most fluency indicator of 19 people, while those with the good category had the most elaboration indicator for 16 students. Learning outcomes are more in the good ranking of 16 people than the very good category (8 people). Through learning the Treffinger model, creative thinking ability, and learning outcomes of animal structure, students vary in the categories of good and very good.

JURNAL PIJAR MIPAVol. 20(2)
University of Mataram (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.