What drives landholders to engage in coastal wetland programs? A synthesis of current knowledge and opportunities for future research

Abstract Globally, coastal wetlands such as mangroves and saltmarshes are in decline. With many coastal wetlands dispersed across privately owned lands, one strategy to promote their protection is through private land coastal wetland programs. While landholder engagement is key to developing such programs, little is known about how landholders interact with coastal wetlands on their properties. Through a global systematic review and meta‐synthesis of 50 studies, we investigate the key factors driving landholders' decisions to engage in coastal wetland programs, and the lessons that could be applicable in guiding future coastal wetland programs. Our analysis revealed that financial benefits such as payments for loss of land for production/farming, and access to grants or loans were important motivations for participation. At the same time, non‐financial motivations such as social recognition and relational values (e.g., strong environmental stewardship values) were also equally important. The most pronounced barrier to landholder engagement was a lack of technical knowledge, skills, and support. Most studies indicated that landholders' preferred incentives for program engagement were assistance for on‐groundwork work such as materials and labor, land tax deductions, one‐off cash/grants, and reliable program support officers. We also found that studies examining variations in preferences for program participation across landholder types and different coastal wetland contexts were sparse. Based on our review, we discuss strategies for improving landholder participation in potential coastal wetland programs and highlight areas where future research would prove valuable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70030
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What drives landholders to engage in coastal wetland programs? A synthesis of current knowledge and opportunities for future research

Peter Ian Macreadie, Phebe I. Rowland, Melissa Wartman, A. Rifaee Rasheed
4 citations
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
4.42
article

What drives landholders to engage in coastal wetland programs? A synthesis of current knowledge and opportunities for future research

Peter Ian Macreadie, Phebe I. Rowland, Melissa Wartman, A. Rifaee Rasheed
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Globally, coastal wetlands such as mangroves and saltmarshes are in decline. With many coastal wetlands dispersed across privately owned lands, one strategy to promote their protection is through private land coastal wetland programs. While landholder engagement is key to developing such programs, little is known about how landholders interact with coastal wetlands on their properties. Through a global systematic review and meta‐synthesis of 50 studies, we investigate the key factors driving landholders' decisions to engage in coastal wetland programs, and the lessons that could be applicable in guiding future coastal wetland programs. Our analysis revealed that financial benefits such as payments for loss of land for production/farming, and access to grants or loans were important motivations for participation. At the same time, non‐financial motivations such as social recognition and relational values (e.g., strong environmental stewardship values) were also equally important. The most pronounced barrier to landholder engagement was a lack of technical knowledge, skills, and support. Most studies indicated that landholders' preferred incentives for program engagement were assistance for on‐groundwork work such as materials and labor, land tax deductions, one‐off cash/grants, and reliable program support officers. We also found that studies examining variations in preferences for program participation across landholder types and different coastal wetland contexts were sparse. Based on our review, we discuss strategies for improving landholder participation in potential coastal wetland programs and highlight areas where future research would prove valuable.

Conservation Science and PracticeVol. 7(5)
Deakin University (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Deakin University
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.