On the Difficulty of Defining Duration of Deafness for Adults With Cochlear Implants

The amount of time that a person with a cochlear implant experiences severe-to-profound hearing loss before implantation is thought to impact the underlying neural survival, health, and function of the auditory system, thus likely being closely related to post-implantation performance in auditory tasks. The reporting of this number in the research literature is ubiquitous. Although it is most commonly called "duration of deafness," our point of view is that the term is imprecise and the calculation of this number can be nontrivial, particularly for cases of adult onset of hearing loss. We provide suggestions on changing the terminology to "duration of severe-to-profound hearing loss." We also propose a method of determining this number through a series of questions that leads a participant/patient through their progression of hearing loss. We encourage research methodology that requires researchers to explicitly report the process used to determine the duration of severe-to-profound hearing loss with the overall goals of (1) improving rigor and reproducibility in cochlear-implant research and (2) improving the translation between research findings and clinical recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ear and Hearing
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001666
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Difficulty of Defining Duration of Deafness for Adults With Cochlear Implants

Anna R. Tinnemore, Matthew J. Goupell, Rebecca S. Kelly, Nicole Nguyen
3 citations
Ear and Hearing
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
4.29
article

On the Difficulty of Defining Duration of Deafness for Adults With Cochlear Implants

Anna R. Tinnemore, Matthew J. Goupell, Rebecca S. Kelly, Nicole Nguyen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The amount of time that a person with a cochlear implant experiences severe-to-profound hearing loss before implantation is thought to impact the underlying neural survival, health, and function of the auditory system, thus likely being closely related to post-implantation performance in auditory tasks. The reporting of this number in the research literature is ubiquitous. Although it is most commonly called "duration of deafness," our point of view is that the term is imprecise and the calculation of this number can be nontrivial, particularly for cases of adult onset of hearing loss. We provide suggestions on changing the terminology to "duration of severe-to-profound hearing loss." We also propose a method of determining this number through a series of questions that leads a participant/patient through their progression of hearing loss. We encourage research methodology that requires researchers to explicitly report the process used to determine the duration of severe-to-profound hearing loss with the overall goals of (1) improving rigor and reproducibility in cochlear-implant research and (2) improving the translation between research findings and clinical recommendations.

Ear and HearingVol. 46(5)
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
4.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.