Validity of common body temperature sites and gait parameters during a heat tolerance test

A heat tolerance test (HTT) can aid in return-to-play decision making following exertional heat stroke (EHS). The HTT uses rectal temperature (T<sub>REC</sub>, >38.5°C) and heart rate thresholds (HR; >150 bpm) to identify "heat intolerance." Unfortunately, T<sub>REC</sub> is prohibited in some clinical settings (e.g. secondary schools), making a standard HTT unusable. Recently, gait sensors were used to identify heat illness, but have never been correlated with T<sub>REC</sub> during a HTT. No research has compared gait or noninvasive body temperature sites to T<sub>REC</sub> to determine their surrogacy for T<sub>REC</sub> during a HTT. Eighteen subjects underwent a standard HTT (12 men, 6 women; age: 22 ± 2y; height: 168.3 ± 8.5 cm; mass: 76.6 ± 14.8 kg). Rectal, oral, aural, forehead, and axillary temperatures, gait metrics, and HR were measured every 5 minutes during a HTT. Temperature sites were invalid if bias (i.e. difference from T<sub>REC</sub>) was >±0.27°C. Spearman correlations examined the relationship between T<sub>REC</sub> and gait variables. Mean aural, oral, axillary, and forehead bias were -0.19 ± 0.56°C, 0.70 ± 0.53°C, 0.85 ± 0.45°C, and 1.38 ± 0.69°C, respectively (F<sub>2,35</sub> = 42.3, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Aural, oral, forehead, and axillary measurements exceeded our validity threshold 48 ± 30% (169 of 353), 87 ± 16% (307 of 353), 91 ± 15% (321 of 353), and 93 ± 10% (328 of 353) of the time, respectively. T<sub>REC</sub> was significantly negatively correlated to shock (<i>r</i> =-0.28, <i>p</i> < 0.001), impact g (<i>r</i> =-0.28, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and braking g (<i>r</i>=-0.24, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and positively correlated with pronation excursion (<i>r</i> = 0.30, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Clinicians should use T<sub>REC</sub> during an HTT as no alternative, valid temperature site was found. Some gait variables showed promise for tracking T<sub>REC</sub> during a HTT, but more research is necessary.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Temperature
Published
2025-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2025.2493456
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity of common body temperature sites and gait parameters during a heat tolerance test

Kevin C. Miller, Rachel M. Koldenhoven, Erin M. Lally
1 citations
Temperature
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
1.16
article

Validity of common body temperature sites and gait parameters during a heat tolerance test

Kevin C. Miller, Rachel M. Koldenhoven, Erin M. Lally
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A heat tolerance test (HTT) can aid in return-to-play decision making following exertional heat stroke (EHS). The HTT uses rectal temperature (T<sub>REC</sub>, >38.5°C) and heart rate thresholds (HR; >150 bpm) to identify "heat intolerance." Unfortunately, T<sub>REC</sub> is prohibited in some clinical settings (e.g. secondary schools), making a standard HTT unusable. Recently, gait sensors were used to identify heat illness, but have never been correlated with T<sub>REC</sub> during a HTT. No research has compared gait or noninvasive body temperature sites to T<sub>REC</sub> to determine their surrogacy for T<sub>REC</sub> during a HTT. Eighteen subjects underwent a standard HTT (12 men, 6 women; age: 22 ± 2y; height: 168.3 ± 8.5 cm; mass: 76.6 ± 14.8 kg). Rectal, oral, aural, forehead, and axillary temperatures, gait metrics, and HR were measured every 5 minutes during a HTT. Temperature sites were invalid if bias (i.e. difference from T<sub>REC</sub>) was >±0.27°C. Spearman correlations examined the relationship between T<sub>REC</sub> and gait variables. Mean aural, oral, axillary, and forehead bias were -0.19 ± 0.56°C, 0.70 ± 0.53°C, 0.85 ± 0.45°C, and 1.38 ± 0.69°C, respectively (F<sub>2,35</sub> = 42.3, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Aural, oral, forehead, and axillary measurements exceeded our validity threshold 48 ± 30% (169 of 353), 87 ± 16% (307 of 353), 91 ± 15% (321 of 353), and 93 ± 10% (328 of 353) of the time, respectively. T<sub>REC</sub> was significantly negatively correlated to shock (<i>r</i> =-0.28, <i>p</i> < 0.001), impact g (<i>r</i> =-0.28, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and braking g (<i>r</i>=-0.24, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and positively correlated with pronation excursion (<i>r</i> = 0.30, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Clinicians should use T<sub>REC</sub> during an HTT as no alternative, valid temperature site was found. Some gait variables showed promise for tracking T<sub>REC</sub> during a HTT, but more research is necessary.

TemperatureVol. 12(3)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Validity of common body temperature sites and gait parameters during a heat tolerance test — Kevin C. Miller, Rachel M. Koldenhoven, et al. · Temperature (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS