Competition, experiments and price theory. On a controversial return to the classical economists

The paper discusses the call by Sabiou Inoua and Nobel laureate Vernon Smith for a return to Adam Smith based on what “experimental economics” would have in common with the approach of the classical economists. The aim of the two authors is to provide an alternative to the neoclassical approach, both as a general theory of prices and, more specifically, as an account of the working of competition. Such an authoritative call for a theoretical breakthrough is undoubtedly welcome news to all advocates of a comparative approach among alternative research programmes in economic theory. We argue, however, that Inoua and Smith fail in their aim, showing in particular that the major shortcomings of their approach ultimately derive from the rejection of Adam Smith’s distinction between “market prices” and “natural prices.”.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Published
2025-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2025.2491311
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Institutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Competition, experiments and price theory. On a controversial return to the classical economists

Emiliano Brancaccio, Paolo Trabucchi
1 citations
European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Economic Theory and Institutions
3.13
article

Competition, experiments and price theory. On a controversial return to the classical economists

Emiliano Brancaccio, Paolo Trabucchi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The paper discusses the call by Sabiou Inoua and Nobel laureate Vernon Smith for a return to Adam Smith based on what “experimental economics” would have in common with the approach of the classical economists. The aim of the two authors is to provide an alternative to the neoclassical approach, both as a general theory of prices and, more specifically, as an account of the working of competition. Such an authoritative call for a theoretical breakthrough is undoubtedly welcome news to all advocates of a comparative approach among alternative research programmes in economic theory. We argue, however, that Inoua and Smith fail in their aim, showing in particular that the major shortcomings of their approach ultimately derive from the rejection of Adam Smith’s distinction between “market prices” and “natural prices.”.

European Journal of the History of Economic ThoughtVol. 33(1)
Universidade Brasil (BR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Economic Theory and Institutions
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Competition, experiments and price theory. On a controversial return to the classical economists — Emiliano Brancaccio, Paolo Trabucchi · European Journal of the History of Economic Thought (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS