Predicting Middle School Students' English Academic Achievement and Exploring Key Factors Using Machine Learning Techniques

Objectives This study aims to predict middle school students' academic achievement in English using various machine learning techniques and to explore the relative importance of key predictive factors by comparing and analyzing them across different grade levels. Methods To achieve this, machine learning techniques such as k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree (C5.0), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Neural Network (NNET) were utilized. The predictive accuracy of each model was compared and analyzed for each grade level, and the key predictive factors were identified. To compare academic achievement across grade levels, vertical scale scores for each subject were used. The predictive factors were categorized into three levels: individual, family, and school. For data collection, this study used middle school data from the Gyeonggi Education Panel Study (GEPS). After data preprocessing, a total of 499 first-year, 486 second-year, and 457 third-year middle school students were included in the analysis. In total, 394 individual-level variables, 45 family-level variables, and 106 school-level variables were used to predict students' academic achievement, and the results were compared and analyzed accordingly. Results The findings indicate that Support Vector Machine (SVM) achieved the highest predictive performance for first- and second-year students, while Decision Tree (C5.0) performed best for third-year students. The analysis of key predictive factors revealed that previous-year English grades, English class comprehension, English self-efficacy, and learning attitude were consistently significant predictors across all grade levels. On the other hand, family-related factors such as parental education level and household income had relatively lower predictive power. Additionally, as grade levels increased, the importance of school environment factors (e.g., school satisfaction, classroom atmosphere) showed a gradual increase. Conclusions This study utilized various machine learning techniques to predict English academic achievement among middle school students and to compare key predictive factors across different grade levels. Furthermore, the study identified the most suitable predictive model for each grade level by comparing different machine learning algorithms. These findings provide valuable insights for developing customized learning support systems and can serve as foundational data for personalized education strategies and future education policy development.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2025.25.7.637
Primary Topic
Education and Learning Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Middle School Students' English Academic Achievement and Exploring Key Factors Using Machine Learning Techniques

Sujin Hwang, Hyunchul Kim
Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction
Education and Learning Interventions
article

Predicting Middle School Students' English Academic Achievement and Exploring Key Factors Using Machine Learning Techniques

Sujin Hwang, Hyunchul Kim
article en

Abstract

Objectives This study aims to predict middle school students' academic achievement in English using various machine learning techniques and to explore the relative importance of key predictive factors by comparing and analyzing them across different grade levels. Methods To achieve this, machine learning techniques such as k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree (C5.0), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Neural Network (NNET) were utilized. The predictive accuracy of each model was compared and analyzed for each grade level, and the key predictive factors were identified. To compare academic achievement across grade levels, vertical scale scores for each subject were used. The predictive factors were categorized into three levels: individual, family, and school. For data collection, this study used middle school data from the Gyeonggi Education Panel Study (GEPS). After data preprocessing, a total of 499 first-year, 486 second-year, and 457 third-year middle school students were included in the analysis. In total, 394 individual-level variables, 45 family-level variables, and 106 school-level variables were used to predict students' academic achievement, and the results were compared and analyzed accordingly. Results The findings indicate that Support Vector Machine (SVM) achieved the highest predictive performance for first- and second-year students, while Decision Tree (C5.0) performed best for third-year students. The analysis of key predictive factors revealed that previous-year English grades, English class comprehension, English self-efficacy, and learning attitude were consistently significant predictors across all grade levels. On the other hand, family-related factors such as parental education level and household income had relatively lower predictive power. Additionally, as grade levels increased, the importance of school environment factors (e.g., school satisfaction, classroom atmosphere) showed a gradual increase. Conclusions This study utilized various machine learning techniques to predict English academic achievement among middle school students and to compare key predictive factors across different grade levels. Furthermore, the study identified the most suitable predictive model for each grade level by comparing different machine learning algorithms. These findings provide valuable insights for developing customized learning support systems and can serve as foundational data for personalized education strategies and future education policy development.

Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And InstructionVol. 25(7)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Education and Learning Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.