Getting Advanced Placement Psychology Students “Ready Through Research”

Background Recent changes to Introductory Psychology curricula emphasize the importance of building research skills, but instructors may need additional support. Objective This paper examines outcomes of the Ready Through Research (RTR) program in which research mentors from local universities guide Advanced Placement (AP) Psychology students to design, conduct, analyze, and present their research projects. Method Studies 1 ( N = 72) and 2 ( N = 124) compare changes in students’ research skills and science/psychology persistence self-efficacy and examine student perceptions of RTR outcomes across two program iterations. Results RTR students’ research skill self-efficacy grew significantly in both studies. Further, RTR students in both studies reported that the program made them more interested in pursuing research and psychology in the future. In Study 1, students’ science persistence self-efficacy did not change over time, but in Study 2, RTR students’ psychology persistence self-efficacy increased. Conclusion RTR programming benefits AP Psychology students’ research understanding, skills, and persistence, but students may not consider psychology a science discipline. Teaching Implications To meet new curriculum standards, teachers should engage students in psychological research and emphasize that psychology is a science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching of Psychology
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283251335984
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Getting Advanced Placement Psychology Students “Ready Through Research”

Kelly Lynn Mulvey, Kevin Winter, Andrea Koch, Jacqueline Cerda‐Smith
Teaching of Psychology
Career Development and Diversity
article

Getting Advanced Placement Psychology Students “Ready Through Research”

Kelly Lynn Mulvey, Kevin Winter, Andrea Koch, Jacqueline Cerda‐Smith
article en

Abstract

Background Recent changes to Introductory Psychology curricula emphasize the importance of building research skills, but instructors may need additional support. Objective This paper examines outcomes of the Ready Through Research (RTR) program in which research mentors from local universities guide Advanced Placement (AP) Psychology students to design, conduct, analyze, and present their research projects. Method Studies 1 ( N = 72) and 2 ( N = 124) compare changes in students’ research skills and science/psychology persistence self-efficacy and examine student perceptions of RTR outcomes across two program iterations. Results RTR students’ research skill self-efficacy grew significantly in both studies. Further, RTR students in both studies reported that the program made them more interested in pursuing research and psychology in the future. In Study 1, students’ science persistence self-efficacy did not change over time, but in Study 2, RTR students’ psychology persistence self-efficacy increased. Conclusion RTR programming benefits AP Psychology students’ research understanding, skills, and persistence, but students may not consider psychology a science discipline. Teaching Implications To meet new curriculum standards, teachers should engage students in psychological research and emphasize that psychology is a science.

Teaching of Psychology
North Carolina State University (US), International Charter School (US), Illinois State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.