<i>What's in It for the Big Ones?</i> How City- and Suburban Municipalities Vary in Their Motivation to Collaborate

Research shows that small-sized municipalities, in terms of inhabitants, achieve greater operational benefits from shared service delivery than large municipalities. Still, larger municipalities often engage in a higher number of inter-municipal cooperations than smaller municipalities. This paper investigates why large and small municipalities to engage in shared service delivery with each other by analyzing interview data in six Norwegian center city municipalities and their geographical surrounding municipalities. We outline propositions based on three different types of outcomes related to cooperation between organizations: service performance, strategic benefits, and legitimacy. Results indicate that city and suburban municipalities collaborate for different reasons. While surrounding municipalities cooperate to increase operational size, center city municipalities are instead motivated by spatial needs, regional influence and act in response to pressure from institutionalized environments. These findings support the notion that interorganizational relationships should be considered a mixed-motive situation where main goals and motivation may vary between member organizations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Affairs Review
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874251327098
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What's in It for the Big Ones? How City- and Suburban Municipalities Vary in Their Motivation to Collaborate

Dag Ingvar Jacobsen, Einar Leknes, Bent Aslak Brandtzæg, Sara Blåka et al.
1 links
Urban Affairs Review
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

What's in It for the Big Ones? How City- and Suburban Municipalities Vary in Their Motivation to Collaborate

Dag Ingvar Jacobsen, Einar Leknes, Bent Aslak Brandtzæg, Sara Blåka, Erik Magnussen
article en

Abstract

Research shows that small-sized municipalities, in terms of inhabitants, achieve greater operational benefits from shared service delivery than large municipalities. Still, larger municipalities often engage in a higher number of inter-municipal cooperations than smaller municipalities. This paper investigates why large and small municipalities to engage in shared service delivery with each other by analyzing interview data in six Norwegian center city municipalities and their geographical surrounding municipalities. We outline propositions based on three different types of outcomes related to cooperation between organizations: service performance, strategic benefits, and legitimacy. Results indicate that city and suburban municipalities collaborate for different reasons. While surrounding municipalities cooperate to increase operational size, center city municipalities are instead motivated by spatial needs, regional influence and act in response to pressure from institutionalized environments. These findings support the notion that interorganizational relationships should be considered a mixed-motive situation where main goals and motivation may vary between member organizations.

Urban Affairs ReviewVol. 61(6)
University of Agder (NO), NORCE Research AS (NO), Telemark Research Institute (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.