Evaluating the Partisan Effects of Pandemic Mitigation with Polling Place Data from the Republic of Georgia

This study examines the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the administration of Georgia’s 2020 parliamentary elections, focusing on accommodations for quarantined and COVID-infected voters. In response to the pandemic, election officials in Georgia implemented mobile ballot voting and special polling stations to safeguard public health, while ensuring voter participation. Utilizing data from election results and a public opinion survey on COVID-related attitudes among Georgians, this study explores potential factors contributing to the superior performance of the ruling party, Georgian Dream (GD), in mobile polling stations during the first round of parliamentary elections. Three hypotheses are tested to evaluate the performance of GD: partisan differences in pandemic-related behavior, strategic placement of mobile polling stations in pro-GD neighborhoods, and potential bias in election administration favoring the ruling party. This study provides insights into how pandemic-related electoral adaptations may have influenced political outcomes in Georgia’s contested political environment. It contributes to broader discussions on election integrity during crises and how pandemic-driven accommodations can shape electoral processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2024.0016
Primary Topic
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Partisan Effects of Pandemic Mitigation with Polling Place Data from the Republic of Georgia

Erik S. Herron, Ani Tepnadze
Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
article

Evaluating the Partisan Effects of Pandemic Mitigation with Polling Place Data from the Republic of Georgia

Erik S. Herron, Ani Tepnadze
article en

Abstract

This study examines the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the administration of Georgia’s 2020 parliamentary elections, focusing on accommodations for quarantined and COVID-infected voters. In response to the pandemic, election officials in Georgia implemented mobile ballot voting and special polling stations to safeguard public health, while ensuring voter participation. Utilizing data from election results and a public opinion survey on COVID-related attitudes among Georgians, this study explores potential factors contributing to the superior performance of the ruling party, Georgian Dream (GD), in mobile polling stations during the first round of parliamentary elections. Three hypotheses are tested to evaluate the performance of GD: partisan differences in pandemic-related behavior, strategic placement of mobile polling stations in pro-GD neighborhoods, and potential bias in election administration favoring the ruling party. This study provides insights into how pandemic-related electoral adaptations may have influenced political outcomes in Georgia’s contested political environment. It contributes to broader discussions on election integrity during crises and how pandemic-driven accommodations can shape electoral processes.

Election Law Journal Rules Politics and PolicyVol. 24(3)
West Virginia University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.